Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887557›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Patient Derived Xenografts (PDX) Models as an Avatar to Assess Personalized Therapy Options in Uveal Melanoma: A Feasibility Study.

Fariba Nemati, Leanne de Koning, David Gentien, Franck Assayag, Emilie Henry, Khadija Ait Rais, Gaelle Pierron, Odette Mariani, Michèle Nijnikoff, Gabriel Champenois and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of Spliceosome Inhibition in SF3B1-Mutated Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fariba NematiLaboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL University Paris, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8879-7592
Leanne de KoningTranslational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL University Paris, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-3633
David GentienGenomics Platform, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8317-5188
Franck AssayagLaboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL University Paris, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, 75248 Paris, France.
Emilie HenryGenomics Platform, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Khadija Ait RaisDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Gaelle PierronDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Odette MarianiBiological Resource Center, Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Michèle NijnikoffBiological Resource Center, Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Gabriel ChampenoisDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1731-5343
André NicolasDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Didier MeseureDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Sophie GardratDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Nicolas ServantInstitut Curie, INSERM U900, CBIO-Centre for Computational Biology, Mines Paris Tech, PSL-Research University, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-7410
Philippe HupéInstitut Curie, INSERM U900, CBIO-Centre for Computational Biology, Mines Paris Tech, PSL-Research University, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-3424
Maud KamalDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-0950
Christophe Le TourneauDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9772-4686
Sophie Piperno-NeumannDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Manuel RodriguesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5443-0802
Sergio Roman-RomanTranslational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL University Paris, 75248 Paris, France.
Didier DecaudinLaboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, PSL University Paris, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, 75248 Paris, France.
Pascale MarianiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75248 Paris, France.
Nathalie CassouxDepartment of Oncological Ophthalmology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, 75248 Paris, France.
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRInserm · FRInstitut Curie · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Up to 50% of UM patients develop metastatic disease, usually in the liver. When metastatic, the prognosis is poor, and few treatment options exist. Here, we investigated the feasibility of establishing patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from a patient's tumor in order to screen for therapies that the patient could benefit from. Samples obtained from 29 primary tumors and liver metastases of uveal melanoma were grafted into SCID mice. PDX models were successfully established for 35% of primary patient tumors and 67% of liver metastases. The tumor take rate was proportional to the risk of metastases. PDXs showed the same morphology, the same GNAQ/11, BAP1, and SF3B1 mutations, and the same chromosome 3 and 8q status as the corresponding patient samples. Six PDX models were challenged with two compounds for 4 weeks. We show that, for 31% of patients with high or intermediate risk of metastasis, the timing to obtain efficacy results on PDX models derived from their primary tumors was compatible with the selection of the therapy to treat the patient after relapse. PDXs could thus be a valid tool ("avatar") to select the best personalized therapy for one third of patients that are most at risk of relapse.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAnimalsFeasibility StudiesHeterograftsHumansMelanomaMiceMice, SCIDRecurrenceUveal MelanomaUveal Neoplasmsavatarpatient-derived xenografts (PDXs)uveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID37887557
PMCPMC10604955
OpenAlexW4387528576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.