Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887426›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2023

Characterizing Families of Spectral Similarity Scores and Their Use Cases for Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Small Molecule Identification.

David J Degnan, Javier E Flores, Eva R Brayfindley, Vanessa L Paurus, Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson, Chaevien S Clendinen, Lisa M Bramer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David J DegnanBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5737-7173
Javier E FloresBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1550-1655
Eva R BrayfindleyArtificial Intelligence and Data Analytics Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0726-1150
Vanessa L PaurusEnvironmental and Molecular Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.
Bobbie-Jo M Webb-RobertsonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.
Chaevien S ClendinenEnvironmental and Molecular Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.
Lisa M BramerBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8384-1926
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · US

Funding

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Laboratory Directed Research and Development Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL01830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics provides a unique snapshot into the world of small molecules and the complex biological processes that govern the human, animal, plant, and environmental ecosystems encapsulated by the One Health modeling framework. However, this "molecular snapshot" is only as informative as the number of metabolites confidently identified within it. The spectral similarity (SS) score is traditionally used to identify compound(s) in mass spectrometry approaches to metabolomics, where spectra are matched to reference libraries of candidate spectra. Unfortunately, there is little consensus on which of the dozens of available SS metrics should be used. This lack of standard SS score creates analytic uncertainty and potentially leads to issues in reproducibility, especially as these data are integrated across other domains. In this work, we use metabolomic spectral similarity as a case study to showcase the challenges in consistency within just one piece of the One Health framework that must be addressed to enable data science approaches for One Health problems. Here, using a large cohort of datasets comprising both standard and complex datasets with expert-verified truth annotations, we evaluated the effectiveness of 66 similarity metrics to delineate between correct matches (true positives) and incorrect matches (true negatives). We additionally characterize the families of these metrics to make informed recommendations for their use. Our results indicate that specific families of metrics (the Inner Product, Correlative, and Intersection families of scores) tend to perform better than others, with no single similarity metric performing optimally for all queried spectra. This work and its findings provide an empirically-based resource for researchers to use in their selection of similarity metrics for GC-MS identification, increasing scientific reproducibility through taking steps towards standardizing identification workflows.

Indexed as

distance metricsmachine learningmetabolomicsOne Health

Identifiers

PMID37887426
PMCPMC10608912
OpenAlexW4387847688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.