ArticleMetabolites2023
Opening the Random Forest Black Box of
Article in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding complex analytical data by a supervised correlation coefficient obtained from random forest.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Detection of Sugar Syrups in Honey Using Untargeted Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Chemometrics.Metabolites · 2024Article
- Application of untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to routine analysis of food using three-dimensional bucketing and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The untargeted metabolomics analysis of biological samples with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) provides highly complex data containing various signals from different molecules. To use these data for classification, e.g., in the context of food authentication, machine learning methods are used. These methods are usually applied as a black box, which means that no information about the complex relationships between the variables and the outcome is obtained. In this study, we show that the random forest-based approach surrogate minimal depth (SMD) can be applied for a comprehensive analysis of class-specific differences by selecting relevant variables and analyzing their mutual impact on the classification model of different truffle species. SMD allows the assignment of variables from the same metabolites as well as the detection of interactions between different metabolites that can be attributed to known biological relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.