ReviewMetabolites2023
Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling in the Analysis of Endogenous Metabolites.
Review in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- An LC-MS untargeted metabolomic comparison between three blood microsampling devices, whole blood, and plasma.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Volumetric absorptive microsampling for profiling of signaling lipids: a comparative analysis with whole blood and dried blood spots.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A Minimally Invasive LC-MS/MS Approach for Assessing Endocannabinoids in Saliva and Capillary Blood Microsamples.Biosensors · 2026Article
- RPLC- and HILIC-based non-targeted metabolomics workflow for blood microsamples.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- The analytical potential of the dry blood spot technique for pesticide biomonitoring - a review.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025Review
- Connecting the Dots: Bridging Microsamples and Conventional Blood Matrices in Metabolic Biomarker Analysis.Analytical science advances · 2025Review
- UHPLC-MS/MS for Antipsychotic Drug Monitoring: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Analytical Performance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Quantitation of BCAA and BCKA in plasma and patient-centric dried blood microsamples in a clinical setting.Bioanalysis · 2025Article
- Interlaboratory comparison of phosphatidylethanol in dried blood spots using different sampling devices.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
- LC-MS-Based Global Metabolic Profiles of Alternative Blood Specimens Collected by Microsampling.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Targeted and untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics in dried blood microsampling: Recent applications and perspectives.Analytical science advances · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has arisen as a relevant tool in biological analysis, offering simplified sampling procedures and enhanced stability. Most of the attention VAMS has received in the past decade has been from pharmaceutical research, with most of the published work employing VAMS targeting drugs or other exogenous compounds, such as toxins and pollutants. However, biomarker analysis by employing blood microsampling has high promise. Herein, a comprehensive review on the applicability of VAMS devices for the analysis of endogenous metabolites/biomarkers was performed. The study presents a full overview of the analysis process, incorporating all the steps in sample treatment and validation parameters. Overall, VAMS devices have proven to be reliable tools for the analysis of endogenous analytes with biological importance, often offering improved analyte stability in comparison with blood under ambient conditions as well as a convenient and straightforward sample acquisition model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.