Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887283›Full record

ArticleCells2023

Intratumoral Administration of High-Concentration Nitric Oxide and Anti-mPD-1 Treatment Improves Tumor Regression Rates and Survival in CT26 Tumor-Bearing Mice.

Hila Confino, Yogev Sela, Yana Epshtein, Lidor Malka, Matan Goldshtein, Selena Chaisson, Steve Lisi, Amir Avniel, Jedidiah Mercer Monson, Frederick M Dirbas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hila ConfinoBeyond Cancer, Rehovot 7608801, Israel.
Yogev SelaBeyond Cancer, Rehovot 7608801, Israel.
Yana EpshteinBeyond Cancer, Rehovot 7608801, Israel.
Lidor MalkaBeyond Cancer, Rehovot 7608801, Israel.
Matan GoldshteinBeyond Cancer, Rehovot 7608801, Israel.
Selena ChaissonBeyond Cancer, Atlanta, GA 30305, USA.
Steve LisiBeyond Air, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.
Amir AvnielBeyond Air, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.
Jedidiah Mercer MonsonBeyond Cancer, Atlanta, GA 30305, USA.
Frederick M DirbasDepartment of General Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3576-6404
California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence · USORT Israel · ILStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed clinical oncology. However, their use is limited as response is observed in only ~20-50% of patients. Previously, we demonstrated that treating CT26 tumor-bearing mice with ultra-high-concentration gaseous nitric oxide (UNO) followed by tumor resection stimulated antitumor immune responses. Accordingly, UNO may improve tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we investigated the ability of UNO to improve the efficacy of a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody in vitro and in treating CT26 tumor-bearing mice.

methodsCT26 cells were injected into the flank of Balb/c mice (

results(1) Short exposure to 25,000-100,000 parts per million (ppm) UNO in vitro resulted in significant upregulation of PD-L1 expression on CT26 cells. (2) UNO treatment in vivo consistently reduced cell viability in CT26 tumors. (3) Treatment reduced regulatory T-cell (Treg) levels in the tumor and increased levels of systemic M1 macrophages. UNO responders had increased CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltration. (4) Nine days after treatment, primary tumor growth was significantly lower in the combination arm vs. anti-mPD-1 alone (

conclusionCombining high-concentration NO and immune checkpoint inhibitors warrants further assessment especially in tumors resistant to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNitric OxideAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorHumansMiceImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNitric Oxidecancer immunotherapygaseous nitric oxideimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmetastasissolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID37887283
PMCPMC10605471
OpenAlexW4387576576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.