Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887216›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on a Retrospective Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Treated with a Combination of Steroids and Tocilizumab.

Francisco Javier Membrillo de Novales, Germán Ramírez-Olivencia, Maj Tatiana Mata Forte, María Isabel Zamora Cintas, Maj María Simón Sacristán, María Sánchez de Castro, Miriam Estébanez Muñoz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco Javier Membrillo de NovalesCBRN and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", 28047 Madrid, Spain.
Germán Ramírez-OlivenciaCBRN and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", 28047 Madrid, Spain.
Maj Tatiana Mata ForteCBRN and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", 28047 Madrid, Spain.
María Isabel Zamora CintasClinical Microbiology Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", 28047 Madrid, Spain.
Maj María Simón SacristánClinical Microbiology Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", 28047 Madrid, Spain.
María Sánchez de CastroPharmacy Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", 28047 Madrid, Spain.
Miriam Estébanez MuñozCBRN and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", 28047 Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the context of COVID-19, patients with a severe or critical illness may be more susceptible to developing secondary bacterial infections. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and the occurrence of bacterial or fungal isolates following the administration of tocilizumab in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had previously received steroids during the first and second waves of the pandemic in Spain.

methodsThis retrospective observational study included 70 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who received tocilizumab and steroids between January and December 2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, microbiologic results, treatment, and outcomes were collected from electronic health records. The patients were divided into two groups based on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, and the incidence of bacterial and fungal colonizations/infections was analyzed.

resultsAmong the included patients, 45 patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. No significant clinical differences were observed between the patients based on prophylaxis use regarding the number of clinically diagnosed infections, ICU admissions, or mortality rates. However, the patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis showed a higher incidence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria compared to that of the subgroup that did not receive prophylaxis. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were

Indexed as

antimicrobial prophylaxisceftobiproleceftriaxonecoinfectionsCOVID-19superinfections

Identifiers

PMID37887216
PMCPMC10604609
OpenAlexW4387399438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.