Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887131›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2023

Analytical Validation of a Spiral Microfluidic Chip with Hydrofoil-Shaped Pillars for the Enrichment of Circulating Tumor Cells.

Begum Sen-Dogan, Mehmet Alper Demir, Buket Sahin, Ender Yildirim, Gizem Karayalcin, Sebnem Sahin, Ege Mutlu, Taylan Berkin Toral, Ebru Ozgur, Ozge Zorlu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Begum Sen-DoganMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1846-8985
Mehmet Alper DemirMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.
Buket SahinMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.
Ender YildirimMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7969-2243
Gizem KarayalcinMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.
Sebnem SahinMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.
Ege MutluMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.
Taylan Berkin ToralMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.
Ebru OzgurMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2469-0267
Ozge ZorluMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9570-0434
Haluk KulahMikro Biyosistemler A.S., 06530 Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 3189298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from peripheral blood with high efficiency remains a challenge hindering the utilization of CTC enrichment methods in clinical practice. Here, we propose a microfluidic channel design for the size-based hydrodynamic enrichment of CTCs from blood in an epitope-independent and high-throughput manner. The microfluidic channel comprises a spiral-shaped part followed by a widening part, incorporating successive streamlined pillars, that improves the enrichment efficiency. The design was tested against two benchmark designs, a spiral microfluidic channel and a spiral microfluidic channel followed by a widening channel without the hydrofoils, by processing 5 mL of healthy blood samples spiked with 100 MCF-7 cells. The results proved that the design with hydrofoil-shaped pillars perform significantly better in terms of recovery (recovery rate of 67.9% compared to 23.6% in spiral and 56.7% in spiral with widening section), at a cost of slightly lower white blood cell (WBC) depletion (depletion rate of 94.2% compared to 98.6% in spiral and 94.2% in spiral with widening section), at 1500 µL/min flow rate. For analytical validation, the design was further tested with A549, SKOV-3, and BT-474 cell lines, yielding recovery rates of 62.3 ± 8.4%, 71.0 ± 6.5%, and 82.9 ± 9.9%, respectively. The results are consistent with the size and deformability variation in the respective cell lines, where the increasing size and decreasing deformability affect the recovery rate in a positive manner. The analysis before and after the microfluidic chip process showed that the process does not affect cell viability.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingCell Line, TumorCell SeparationHumansMCF-7 CellsMicrofluidicscirculating tumor cell (CTC) separationcomputational fluid dynamicsinertial hydrodynamicsmicrofluidic channel

Identifiers

PMID37887131
PMCPMC10605072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.