Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887080›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2023

AI-Powered Renal Diet Support: Performance of ChatGPT, Bard AI, and Bing Chat.

Ahmad Qarajeh, Supawit Tangpanithandee, Charat Thongprayoon, Supawadee Suppadungsuk, Pajaree Krisanapan, Noppawit Aiumtrakul, Oscar A Garcia Valencia, Jing Miao, Fawad Qureshi, Wisit Cheungpasitporn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmad QarajehDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2457-9435
Supawit TangpanithandeeDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-2338
Charat ThongprayoonDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Supawadee SuppadungsukDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1597-2411
Pajaree KrisanapanDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2888-881X
Noppawit AiumtrakulDepartment of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0479-7785
Oscar A Garcia ValenciaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-9448
Jing MiaoDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-9740
Fawad QureshiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Wisit CheungpasitpornDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-9711
Mayo Clinic · USThammasat University · THUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) necessitate specialized renal diets to prevent complications such as hyperkalemia and hyperphosphatemia. A comprehensive assessment of food components is pivotal, yet burdensome for healthcare providers. With evolving artificial intelligence (AI) technology, models such as ChatGPT, Bard AI, and Bing Chat can be instrumental in educating patients and assisting professionals. To gauge the efficacy of different AI models in discerning potassium and phosphorus content in foods, four AI models-ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4, Bard AI, and Bing Chat-were evaluated. A total of 240 food items, curated from the

Indexed as

AI technologyBard AIBing ChatChatGPTchronic kidney diseaseCKDdietary planningefficacy evaluationfood assessmenthealthcare providershyperkalemiahyperphosphatemiaphosphorus contentpotassium contentrenal diets

Identifiers

PMID37887080
PMCPMC10605499
OpenAlexW4387047777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.