Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37887023›Full record

ReviewBiology2023

Deep Learning Methods for Omics Data Imputation.

Lei Huang, Meng Song, Hui Shen, Huixiao Hong, Ping Gong, Hong-Wen Deng, Chaoyang Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lei HuangSchool of Computing Sciences and Computer Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8654-8663
Meng SongSchool of Computing Sciences and Computer Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.
Hui ShenCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Huixiao HongDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8087-3968
Ping GongEnvironmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4861-9924
Hong-Wen DengCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-8818
Chaoyang ZhangSchool of Computing Sciences and Computer Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.

Funding

Tulane COBRE in Cardiometabolic Diseases Clinical Research CoreP20GM109036 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI JING CHEN · 2016 to 2026
$25.3M
Trans-omics Integration of Multi-omics Studies for OsteoporosisU19AG055373 · NIA · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI HONG-WEN DENG · 2017 to 2026
$24.3M
Identification of Metabolomic Profiles for Sarcopenia Traits in Older Whites and BlacksR01AG061917 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SHEN, HUI, ZHAO, QI · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Decoding Methylation Mediated Epigenomic Contributions to Male OsteoporosisR01AR069055 · NIAMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069055NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061917NIA NIH HHS U19 AG055373NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One common problem in omics data analysis is missing values, which can arise due to various reasons, such as poor tissue quality and insufficient sample volumes. Instead of discarding missing values and related data, imputation approaches offer an alternative means of handling missing data. However, the imputation of missing omics data is a non-trivial task. Difficulties mainly come from high dimensionality, non-linear or non-monotonic relationships within features, technical variations introduced by sampling methods, sample heterogeneity, and the non-random missingness mechanism. Several advanced imputation methods, including deep learning-based methods, have been proposed to address these challenges. Due to its capability of modeling complex patterns and relationships in large and high-dimensional datasets, many researchers have adopted deep learning models to impute missing omics data. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the currently available deep learning-based methods for omics imputation from the perspective of deep generative model architectures such as autoencoder, variational autoencoder, generative adversarial networks, and Transformer, with an emphasis on multi-omics data imputation. In addition, this review also discusses the opportunities that deep learning brings and the challenges that it might face in this field.

Indexed as

deep learningmulti-omics imputationomics imputation

Identifiers

PMID37887023
PMCPMC10604785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.