Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886989›Full record

ArticleBiology2023

Monitoring the Spread of Grapevine Viruses in Vineyards of Contrasting Agronomic Practices: A Metagenomic Investigation.

Minh Vu, Wendy McFadden-Smith, Sudarsana Poojari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling the Effect of the Biological Control ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minh VuCool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-2769
Wendy McFadden-SmithOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Lincoln, ON L0R 2E0, Canada.
Sudarsana PoojariCool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9258-1612
Brock University · CAMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs · CA

Funding

Genome Canada 189GRP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the transmission of grapevine viruses, specifically grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) and grapevine Pinot gris virus (GPGV), in vineyards in Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada. Forty sentinel vines that were confirmed free of GRBV and GPGV by both high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and endpoint polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were introduced to two vineyards (one organic and one conventional) that were heavily infected with both GRBV and GPGV. Four months post-introduction, the sentinel vines were relocated to a phytotron. The HTS results from 15 months post-introduction revealed a widespread infection of GPGV among the sentinel vines but did not detect any GRBV. The GPGV infection rate of sentinel vines in the organic vineyard (13/18) was higher than in the conventional vineyard (1/19). The possibility of an alternative viral reservoir was assessed by testing the most abundant plants in between rows (

Indexed as

alternative hostsgrapevine pinot gris virusgrapevine red blotch virusgrapevine virusesHTSPCRsecondary infectionsentinel vine

Identifiers

PMID37886989
PMCPMC10604868
OpenAlexW4387052467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.