ArticleHeliyon2023
Reliability of force plate-based measures of standing balance in the sub-acute stage of post-stroke recovery.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development, Reliability, and Validity Assessment of a Portable 3D Camera-Based System for Quantifying Postural Sway and Balance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Group Telerehabilitation to Improve Balance and Mobility in Patients After Stroke Performed at Home: A Feasibility and Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Proprioceptive and visual motion detection acuity contribute to children's dynamic postural control.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reliability of Center of Pressure Measures in Chronic Stroke Survivors: Influence of Motor and Cognitive Dual-tasking.Basic and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- A Comprehensive Understanding of Postural Tone Biomechanics: Intrinsic Stiffness, Functional Stiffness, Antagonist Coactivation, and COP Dynamics in Post-Stroke Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A comprehensive multivariate analysis of the center of pressure during quiet standing in patients with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Difficulty controlling balance is one of the major contributors to the increased risk of falls among individuals with stroke. It is important to use reliable and objective measures to improve examination of balance impairments post-stroke, and to in turn inform clinical decision-making. The main objective of this study was to examine the relative and absolute reliabilities of force plate-based balance measures in quiet standing, in the sub-acute stage of stroke recovery. Methods: Twenty-four people with sub-acute stroke (mean age = 61 years) performed two trials of quiet standing, each 30 s long. Sixteen force plate-based balance measures in the time, frequency, or nonlinear domains were calculated. Within-session test-retest reliabilities were investigated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change. Results: Mean speed of displacements of the centre of pressure along the anterior-posterior axis (ICC = 0.91; CI Conclusions: Mean speeds of centre of pressure, directional weight-bearing asymmetry, and speed-based symmetry index are the most reliable force plate-based measures that were evaluated in our study, and can be included in the balance assessments of individuals within the sub-acute stage of post-stroke recovery. These findings can better inform clinicians about the specific balance problems experienced by people in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.