Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886712›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

Single-cell gene set scoring with nearest neighbor graph smoothed data (gssnng).

David L Gibbs, Michael K Strasser, Sui Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David L GibbsShmulevich Lab, Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98106, United States.
Michael K StrasserHuang Lab, Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98106, United States.
Sui HuangHuang Lab, Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98106, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Gene set scoring (or enrichment) is a common dimension reduction task in bioinformatics that can be focused on the differences between groups or at the single sample level. Gene sets can represent biological functions, molecular pathways, cell identities, and more. Gene set scores are context dependent values that are useful for interpreting biological changes following experiments or perturbations. Single sample scoring produces a set of scores, one for each member of a group, which can be analyzed with statistical models that can include additional clinically important factors such as gender or age. However, the sparsity and technical noise of single-cell expression measures create difficulties for these methods, which were originally designed for bulk expression profiling (microarrays, RNAseq). This can be greatly remedied by first applying a smoothing transformation that shares gene measure information within transcriptomic neighborhoods. In this work, we use the nearest neighbor graph of cells for matrix smoothing to produce high quality gene set scores on a per-cell, per-group, level which is useful for visualization and statistical analysis. Availability and implementation: The gssnng software is available using the python package index (PyPI) and works with Scanpy AnnData objects. It can be installed using "pip install gssnng." More information and demo notebooks: see https://github.com/IlyaLab/gssnng.

Identifiers

PMID37886712
PMCPMC10599965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.