Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886700›Full record

ArticleAnimal behaviour2020

Flipping the parental switch: from killing to caring in male mammals.

Robert W Elwood, Danielle S Stolzenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural circuits for mammalian parental behaviour.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Killing behaviors in rodents: from predation to infanticide.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  7. Is paternal oxytocin an oxymoron? Oxytocin, vasopressin, testosterone, oestradiol and cortisol in emerging fatherhood.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert W ElwoodQueen's University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, Belfast, U.K.
Danielle S StolzenbergUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Psychology, Davis, CA, U.S.A.

Funding

Epigenetic Mechanisms Regulate the Development of Parental BehaviorR01HD087709 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI STOLZENBERG, DANIELLE SUZANNE · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Killing of unrelated young by sexually naïve male mammals is taxonomically widespread, but in many species, males subsequently show paternal care or at least do not harm their own young. This dramatic and important change is due to a shift in paternal state rather than to recognition of young, the mother or the location in which mating occurred. This transition from infanticidal to paternal behaviour is timed so that the inhibition of infanticide is synchronized with the birth of their own young. Ejaculation followed by cohabitation with the pregnant female causes this transition, but the precise stimuli from the female remain elusive. However, changes in social status also cause changes in infanticide. The switch from infanticide is accompanied by physiological change in the male that can be detected by both females and pups. Hormonal changes have been implicated in the switch but establishing causal links has been difficult. Recent neuroanatomical studies show that pup odours activate the vomeronasal organ and its efferent projections to induce infanticide. The emergence of paternal care depends on the inability of the vomeronasal organ to detect pup odours. In the absence of vomeronasal input, pup odours activate a conserved parental circuit and induce caregiving behaviour. An emerging picture is of complex, antagonistic circuits competing for behavioural expression, which allow for males to commit infanticide when they may benefit from such activity but ensure that they do not damage their fitness by killing their own young. However, we stress the need for more work on the neural mechanisms that mediate this process.

Indexed as

cohabitationcopulationhormonesinfanticidemammalsneural mechanismspaternal care

Identifiers

PMID37886700
PMCPMC10601518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.