Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886699›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2023

Nuclear and Urinary Measurements Show the Efficacy of Sun-Protection Factor 50+ Sunscreen against DNA Photoproducts upon Real-Life Recreational Exposure.

Thierry Douki, Sylvain Caillat, Daniel Bacqueville, Camille Géniès, Celine Huyghe, Hélène Duplan, Jimmy Le Digabel, Christophe Lauze, Jerome Filiol, Razvan Marinescu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Characterising the urinary excretion of thymidine dimer photolesions in mice.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thierry DoukiSyMMES, IRIG, CEA, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Sylvain CaillatSyMMES, IRIG, CEA, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Daniel BacquevilleR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Camille GénièsR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Celine HuygheR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Hélène DuplanR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Jimmy Le DigabelR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Christophe LauzeR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Jerome FiliolR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Razvan MarinescuR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Karine BouyerR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Emmanuel QuestelR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Gwendal JosseR&D - Dermo-cosmetique - Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sunscreens have been shown to protect against UVR-induced DNA damage in human skin under laboratory conditions. We presently extended these observations to real-life conditions in volunteers after their ordinary exposure habits during summer holidays. Volunteers were randomly assigned to a control group and an educated group supplied with a SPF ≥50 sunscreen and receiving instructions for use. A questionnaire was used to determine the extent of exposure. No difference in average solar UVR exposure was found between the two groups. DNA photoprotection was first assessed by, to our knowledge, a previously unreported noninvasive assay on the basis of the quantification of pyrimidine dimers released by DNA repair in urine. Damage was also quantified in the nuclear DNA extracted from the roof of suction blisters collected after recreational exposure. The urinary concentration of photoproducts was significantly higher in the control than in the educated group. The same trend was observed for the level of photoproducts in the DNA from suction blisters. The unambiguous observation of an efficient photoprotection against DNA damage afforded by sunscreen under real-life conditions provides strong support for the efficiency of the sunscreens. In addition, the results validate the use of urinary DNA photoproducts as a noninvasive assay applicable to photoprotection.

Identifiers

PMID37886699
PMCPMC10597780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.