Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886569›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Early Resistance Rehabilitation Improves Functional Regeneration Following Segmental Bone Defect Injury.

Kylie E Williams, Julia Andraca Harrer, Steven A LaBelle, Kelly Leguineche, Jarred Kaiser, Salil Karipott, Angela Lin, Alyssa Vongphachanh, Travis Fulton, J Walker Rosenthal and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kylie E WilliamsPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-8812-8898
Julia Andraca HarrerPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Steven A LaBelleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 841123.
Kelly LeguinechePhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Jarred KaiserAtlanta Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA.
Salil KaripottPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-6047
Angela LinPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Alyssa VongphachanhPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Travis FultonAtlanta Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA.
J Walker RosenthalPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Farhan MuhibDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 841123.
Keat Ghee OngPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Jeffrey A WeissDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 841123.
Nick J WillettPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-2549
Robert E GuldbergPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact Department of Bioengineering, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Impact · CAUniversity of Utah · USEmory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Finite Elements For Biomechanics And BiophysicsR01GM083925 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERARD A. ATESHIAN, JEFFREY A. WEISS · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Regenerative Rehabilitation of Complex Musculoskeletal InjuriesR01AR069297 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ROBERT E Guldberg · 2016 to 2026
$5.6M
Immunoengineering Strategies for Musculoskeletal TraumaR01AR074960 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GULDBERG, ROBERT E · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Lab-to-User Training and Dissemination for the FEBio Software SuiteU24EB029007 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WEISS, JEFFREY A. · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069297NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074960NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029007NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical loading is integral to bone development and repair. The application of mechanical loads through rehabilitation are regularly prescribed as a clinical aide following severe bone injuries. However, current rehabilitation regimens typically involve long periods of non-loading and rely on subjective patient feedback, leading to muscle atrophy and soft tissue fibrosis. While many pre-clinical studies have focused on unloading, ambulatory loading, or direct mechanical compression, rehabilitation intensity and its impact on the local strain environment and subsequent bone healing have largely not been investigated. This study combines implantable strain sensors and subject-specific finite element models in a pre-clinical rodent model with a defect size on the cusp of critically-sized. Animals were enrolled in either high or low intensity rehabilitation one week post injury to investigate how rehabilitation intensity affects the local mechanical environment and subsequent functional bone regeneration. The high intensity rehabilitation animals were given free access to running wheels with resistance, which increased local strains within the regenerative niche by an average of 44% compared to the low intensity (no-resistance) group. Finite element modeling demonstrated that resistance rehabilitation significantly increased compressive strain by a factor of 2.0 at week 1 and 4.45 after 4 weeks of rehabilitation. The resistance rehabilitation group had significantly increased regenerated bone volume and higher bone bridging rates than its sedentary counterpart (bone volume: 22.00 mm

Identifiers

PMID37886569
PMCPMC10602073
OpenAlexW4387333411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.