Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2023
The Evaluation and Exploration of Piezoelectric Parameter Optimization for Droplet Ejection in Binder Jet 3D Printing Drugs.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comparative Study of Commercial 3D Printers for Food Fabrication Based on Printing Ink Gels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Exploration of Ink Formulations in Binder Jet 3D Printing Drugs.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the first three-dimensional (3D) printed drug was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015, there has been a growing interest in using binder jet 3D printing (BJ-3DP) technology for pharmaceuticals. However, most studies are still at an exploratory stage, lacking micromechanism research, such as the droplet ejection mechanism, the effect of printhead piezoelectric parameters on inkjet smoothness and preparation formability. In this study, based on the inkjet printing and observation platform, the Epson I3200-A1 piezoelectric printhead matched to the self-developed BJ-3DP was selected to analyze the droplet ejection state of self-developed ink at the microlevel with different piezoelectric pulse parameters. The results showed that there was a stable inkjet state with an inkjet pulse width of 3.5 μs, an ink supply pulse width of 4.5 μs, and a jet frequency in the range of 5000-19,000 Hz, ensuring both better droplet pattern and print accuracy, as well as high ejection efficiency. In conclusion, we performed a systematic evaluation of the inkjet behavior under different piezoelectric pulse parameters and provided a good idea and case study for the optimization of printhead piezoelectric parameters when BJ-3DP technology was used in pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.