Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886399›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2023

Three-Dimensional Printed Cellulose for Wound Dressing Applications.

Farah Fahma, Afrinal Firmanda, Jaydee Cabral, Daniel Pletzer, John Fisher, Bhushan Mahadik, I Wayan Arnata, Dewi Sartika, Anting Wulandari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Farah FahmaDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University (Bogor Agricultural University), Bogor, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-1217
Afrinal FirmandaDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University (Bogor Agricultural University), Bogor, Indonesia.
Jaydee CabralDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Daniel PletzerDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-7505
John FisherFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Bhushan MahadikFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
I Wayan ArnataDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Udayana University, Badung, Indonesia.
Dewi SartikaFaculty of Agriculture, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Anting WulandariDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agroindustrial Technology, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.
IPB University · IDUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Otago · NZMuhammadiyah University of Makassar · IDPadjadjaran University · IDUdayana University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wounds are skin tissue damage due to trauma. Many factors inhibit the wound healing phase (hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and alteration), such as oxygenation, contamination/infection, age, effects of injury, sex hormones, stress, diabetes, obesity, drugs, alcoholism, smoking, nutrition, hemostasis, debridement, and closing time. Cellulose is the most abundant biopolymer in nature which is promising as the main matrix of wound dressings because of its good structure and mechanical stability, moisturizes the area around the wound, absorbs excess exudate, can form elastic gels with the characteristics of bio-responsiveness, biocompatibility, low toxicity, biodegradability, and structural similarity with the extracellular matrix (ECM). The addition of active ingredients as a model drug helps accelerate wound healing through antimicrobial and antioxidant mechanisms. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology can print cellulose as a bioink to produce wound dressings with complex structures mimicking ECM. The 3D printed cellulose-based wound dressings are a promising application in modern wound care. This article reviews the use of 3D printed cellulose as an ideal wound dressing and their properties, including mechanical properties, permeability aspect, absorption ability, ability to retain and provide moisture, biodegradation, antimicrobial property, and biocompatibility. The applications of 3D printed cellulose in the management of chronic wounds, burns, and painful wounds are also discussed.

Indexed as

3D-bioprinting3D-printedcellulosewound dressing

Identifiers

PMID37886399
PMCPMC10599445
OpenAlexW4306412264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.