Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886349›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35 % at least 40 days after acute myocardial infarction.

Gregory L Judson, Beth E Cohen, Anoop Muniyappa, Merritt H Raitt, Hui Shen, Gary Tarasovsky, Mary A Whooley, Sanket S Dhruva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory L JudsonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Beth E CohenDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Anoop MuniyappaClinical Informatics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Merritt H RaittKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Hui ShenSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, CA, United States of America.
Gary TarasovskySan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, CA, United States of America.
Mary A WhooleyDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Sanket S DhruvaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
San Francisco VA Health Care System · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

HSRD VA I50 HX003266HSRD VA IK2 HX003357HSRD VA SDR 02-237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death among patients with persistently reduced (≤35 %) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 40 days following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Few prior studies have used LVEF measured after the 40-day waiting period to examine primary prevention ICD placement. Methods: We sought to determine factors associated with ICD placement among patients who met LVEF criteria post-MI within a large integrated health care system in the U.S by conducting a retrospective cohort study of Veteran patients hospitalized for AMI from 2004 to 2017 who had documented LVEF ≤35 % from echocardiograms performed between 40 and 455 (90 days +1 year) days post-MI. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with ICD placement. Results: Of 12,893 patients with LVEF ≤35 % at least 40 days post-MI, 2176 (16.9 %) received an ICD between 91- and 455-days post-MI. Younger age, fewer comorbidities, revascularization with PCI, and greater use of GDMT were associated with increased odds of receiving an ICD. However, half of patients treated with a beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist prior to LVEF assessment did not receive an ICD. Eligible Black patients were less likely (odds ratio 0.80, 95 % confidence interval 0.69-0.92) to receive an ICD than White patients. Conclusion: Many factors affect ICD placement among Veteran patients with a confirmed LVEF ≤35 % at least 40 days post-MI. Greater understanding of factors influencing ICD placement would help clinicians ensure guideline-concordant care.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular disease among VeteransGuideline-based careImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID37886349
PMCPMC10601204
OpenAlexW4286436615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.