Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886231›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2023

Assessing the real-world effectiveness of five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a cohort of Mexican pensioners: a nationwide nested test-negative design study.

Mauricio Hernandez-Avila, Edgar Ortiz-Brizuela, Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz, Rodrigo Zepeda-Tello, Héctor Gutierrez-Diaz, David Barros-Sierra Cordera, Waldo Vieyra-Romero, Gabriel Alejandro Real-Ornelas, Mauricio Méndez Aranda, Antonio Heras Gómez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mauricio Hernandez-AvilaDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Edgar Ortiz-BrizuelaDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marcela Tamayo-OrtizOccupational Health Research Unit, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rodrigo Zepeda-TelloDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Héctor Gutierrez-DiazDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
David Barros-Sierra CorderaDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Waldo Vieyra-RomeroDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gabriel Alejandro Real-OrnelasDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mauricio Méndez ArandaDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Antonio Heras GómezDirectorate of Social and Economic Benefits, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mexican Social Security Institute · MXColumbia University · USInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the extensive distribution of COVID-19 vaccines across Latin America, research on their real-world performance remains limited. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of five vaccines (BNT162b2, AZD1222, CoronaVac, Gam-COVID-Vac, and Ad5-nCoV) in a cohort of 2,559,792 pensioners covered by the Mexican Institute of Social Security. Methods: We conducted a nested test-negative design study on 28,271 individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection between April and November 2021, accounting for 29,226 separate episodes. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) in fully vaccinated individuals for symptomatic infection, hospitalization, severe disease, and death. Findings: The median age of the study population was 70 years (interquartile range 65-76) and 76.4% (21,598/28,271) were male. VE rates were 56.3%, 75.3%, 79.7%, and 79.8% against symptomatic infection (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53.5-59.0), hospitalization (95% CI: 73.4-77.0), severe disease (95% CI: 78.0-81.3), and death (95% CI: 78.1-81.4), respectively. When evaluating vaccines individually, all showed moderate to high VE, with the best being BNT162b2 (symptomatic infection, 69.8%, 95% CI: 67.3-72.0; hospitalization, 84.1%, 95% CI: 82.5-85.6; severe disease, 88.2%, 95% CI: 86.7-89.5; and death, 88.3%, 95% CI: 86.9-89.6) and Gam-COVID-Vac (symptomatic infection, 70.0%, 95% CI: 64.8-74.4; hospitalization, 86.8%, 95% CI: 83.7-89.3; severe disease, 91.9%, 95% CI: 89.4-93.9; and death, 92.0%, 95% CI: 89.5-93.9). Interpretation: All five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines available for this population showed moderate to high levels of protection against COVID-19 and its progression to severe outcomes. Funding: Fundación IMSS, México.

Indexed as

COVID-19ElderlyOlder adultsSARS-CoV-2Vaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID37886231
PMCPMC10597758
OpenAlexW4387795979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.