Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886218›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023

Guideline adherence in the use of coronary angiography in patients presenting at the emergency department without myocardial infarction - Results from the German ENLIGHT-KHK project.

Bastian Wein, Yana Seleznova, Dirk Mueller, Marie Naumann, Simon Loeser, Melanie Steffen, Ute Windhoevel, Michael Haude, Juergen Vom Dahl, Ulrich Schaefer and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Bastian WeinElisabeth-Hospital, Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Essen, Germany.
Yana SeleznovaInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Dirk MuellerInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Marie NaumannInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Simon LoeserAOK Rheinland-Hamburg, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Melanie SteffenElisabeth-Hospital, Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Essen, Germany.
Ute WindhoevelCERC Deutschland GmbH, Essen, Germany.
Michael HaudeRheinlandklinikum Neuss, Germany.
Juergen Vom DahlMariahilf Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
Ulrich SchaeferHeart and Vascular Centre, Bad Bevensen, Germany.
Moritz MontenbruckMarien-Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Ruediger JegodkaElisabeth Hospital, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Thorsten DillSana Hospital Benrath, Medical Department, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jan-Erik GuelkerPetrus Hospital, Department of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Wuppertal, Germany.
Dirk BoeseHochsauerland Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Arnsberg, Germany.
Björn BogsElisabeth-Hospital, Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Essen, Germany.
Eva HarmelCardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Germany.
Oliver BruderElisabeth-Hospital, Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Essen, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DEKliniken Maria Hilf · DEKlinik Lüneburger Heide · DEKlinikum Arnsberg · DEKlinikum Rheine · DERuhr University Bochum · DESana Klinikum · DESt. Marien Hospital · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), direct coronary angiography (CA) is recommended, while for non-AMI patients, the diagnostic work-up depends on clinical criteria. This analysis provides initial prospective German data for the degree of guideline-adherence (GL) in the use of CA on non-AMI patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) according to the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL. Furthermore the implications of the application of the 2020 ESC-ACS-GL recommendations were evaluated. Methods: Patient symptoms were identified using a standardized questionnaire; medical history and diagnostic work-up were acquired from health records. In accordance with the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL, CA was considered GL-adherent if intermediate risk criteria (IRC) were present or non-invasive, image-guided testing (NIGT) was pathological. Results: Between January 2019 and August 2021, 229 patients were recruited across seven centers. Patients presented with chest pain, dyspnea, and other symptoms in 66.7%, 16.2% and 17.1%, respectively, were in mean 66.3 ± 10.5 years old, and 36.3% were female. In accordance with the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL, the use of CA was GL-adherent for 64.0% of the patients. GL-adherent compared to non-adherent use of CA resulted in revascularization more often (44.5% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001). Applying the 2020 ESC-ACS-GL, 20.4% of CA would remain GL-adherent. Conclusions: In the majority of cases, the use of CA was adherent to the 2015 ESC-ACS-GL. With regard to the 2020 and 2023 ESC-ACS-GL, efforts to expand the utilization of NIGT are crucial, especially as GL-adherent use of CA is more likely to result in revascularization.(German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00015638; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00015638; (registration date: 19 February 2019)).

Indexed as

Chest painCoronary angiographyEmergency departmentGuidelineGuideline adherence

Identifiers

PMID37886218
PMCPMC10597756
OpenAlexW4387833200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.