Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886081›Full record

ReviewChemical science2023

Picking the lock of coordination cage catalysis.

Tomasz K Piskorz, Vicente Martí-Centelles, Rebecca L Spicer, Fernanda Duarte, Paul J Lusby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Transformation of a PdChemical science · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Single-Step Synthesis of a Heterometallic [CuAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomasz K PiskorzChemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3TA UK fernanda.duartegonzalez@chem.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-6874
Vicente Martí-CentellesInstituto Interuniversitario de Investigación de Reconocimiento Molecular y Desarrollo Tecnológico (IDM), Universitat Politècnica de València, Universitat de València Camino de Vera, s/n 46022 Valencia Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9142-9392
Rebecca L SpicerDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University Lancaster LA14YB UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7637-1006
Fernanda DuarteChemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3TA UK fernanda.duartegonzalez@chem.ox.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-8209
Paul J LusbyEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland EH9 3FJ UK Paul.Lusby@ed.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-5687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design principles of metallo-organic assembly reactions have facilitated access to hundreds of coordination cages of varying size and shape. Many of these assemblies possess a well-defined cavity capable of hosting a guest, pictorially mimicking the action of a substrate binding to the active site of an enzyme. While there are now a growing collection of coordination cages that show highly proficient catalysis, exhibiting both excellent activity and efficient turnover, this number is still small compared to the vast library of metal-organic structures that are known. In this review, we will attempt to unpick and discuss the key features that make an effective coordination cage catalyst, linking structure to activity (and selectivity) using lessons learnt from both experimental and computational analysis of the most notable exemplars. We will also provide an outlook for this area, reasoning why coordination cages have the potential to become the gold-standard in (synthetic) non-covalent catalysis.

Identifiers

PMID37886081
PMCPMC10599471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.