Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886037›Full record

ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2023

Powdered Hierarchically Porous Silica Monoliths for the Selective Extraction of Scandium.

Aaron Brewer, Chloé Reicher, Olivia Manatschal, Hongzhi Bai, Kazuki Nakanishi, Freddy Kleitz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aaron BrewerDepartment of Functional Materials and Catalysis, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-6660
Chloé ReicherDepartment of Functional Materials and Catalysis, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Olivia ManatschalDepartment of Functional Materials and Catalysis, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Hongzhi BaiDPS Inc., 615-8530 Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuki NakanishiInstitute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya University, 464-8601 Nagoya, Japan.
Freddy KleitzDepartment of Functional Materials and Catalysis, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-4180
University of Vienna · ATKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scandium (Sc) is a high value Critical Material that is most commonly used in advanced alloys. Due to current and potential supply limitations, there has been an international effort to find new and improved ways to extract Sc from existing and novel resources. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is one promising approach for Sc recovery, particularly for use with low-grade feedstocks. Here, unfunctionalized, powdered hierarchically porous silica monoliths from DPS Inc. (DPS) are used for Sc extraction in batch and semicontinuous flow systems at model conditions. The sorbent exhibits excellent mass transfer properties, much like the whole monoliths, which should permit Sc to be rapidly recovered from large volumes of feedstock. The Sc adsorption capacity of the material is ∼142.7 mg/g at pH 6, dropping to ∼12.0 mg/g at pH 3, and adsorption is furthermore highly selective for Sc compared with the other rare earth elements (REEs). Under semicontinuous flow conditions, recovery efficiency is limited by a kinetic process. The primary mechanism responsible for the system's slow approach to equilibrium is the Sc adsorption reaction kinetics rather than inter- or intraparticle diffusion. Overall, this unmodified hierarchically porous silica powder from DPS shows great promise for the selective extraction of Sc from various feedstocks.

Identifiers

PMID37886037
PMCPMC10598872
OpenAlexW4387539756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.