Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37886016›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2023

Dosimetric and radiobiological analyses of a de-escalation strategy for elective nodal regions in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Natsuo Tomita, Naoki Hayashi, Tomoki Mizuno, Yuto Kitagawa, Keisuke Yasui, Yasunori Saito, Shuo Sudo, Seiya Takano, Nozomi Kita, Akira Torii and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natsuo TomitaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Naoki HayashiDivision of Medical Physics, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Tomoki MizunoDepartment of Radiology, Toyokawa City Hospital, 23 Yawatachonoji, Toyokawa, Aichi 442-8561, Japan.
Yuto KitagawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Keisuke YasuiDivision of Medical Physics, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Yasunori SaitoDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Shuo SudoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Seiya TakanoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Nozomi KitaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Akira ToriiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Masanari NiwaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Dai OkazakiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Taiki TakaokaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Daisuke KawakitaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Shinichi IwasakiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Akio HiwatashiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPToyokawa City Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In this simulation study, we examined the effects of a de-escalation strategy with a reduced dose to subclinical nodal regions in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). Methods: We created two patterns of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 16 patients with HPV-associated OPC. In the standard and de-escalation plans, the initial field including elective nodal regions received 46 and 30 Gy, followed by 20 and 36 Gy to the cutdown field, respectively. Comparison metrics were set for each organ at risk (OAR). We compared these metric values and the probability of adverse effects based on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model between the two plans. Results: Both plans generally met the dose constraints for the targets and all OAR. Among the comparison metrics, the mean doses to the brain, pharyngeal constrictor muscle, thyroid, and skin and the dose to a 1 % volume of the skin were higher in the standard plan than in the de-escalation plan ( Conclusions: A de-escalation strategy with elective nodal regions is a promising treatment to prevent a decline in the quality of life in patients with HPV-associated OPC, particularly xerostomia, dysphagia, and hypothyroidism.

Indexed as

Adverse effectsHuman papillomavirusIntensity-modulated radiotherapyNTCPOropharyngeal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37886016
PMCPMC10598397
OpenAlexW4387619132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.