ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
Cell sheet transplantation for ischemic heart disease: a systematic review.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scaffold-free cell sheet therapies: clinical advances, global approval landscapes, and strategic directions to address regenerative medicine barriers.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cell sheet transplantation is emerging as an appealing alternative for ischemic heart disease patients as it potentially can increase stem cell viability and retention. But the outcomes and safety of this treatment are still limited in literature and the result varies widely. We conduct a systematic review to look at the efficacy and safety of this promising transplantation method. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. Articles were thoroughly evaluated and analyzed. Results: Seven publications about cell sheet transplantation for ischemic heart disease patients were included. The primary outcomes measured were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Safety measurement was depicted by cardiac-related readmission and deaths. The follow-up time ranged from 3 to 36 months for clinical outcomes and 8.5 years for safety outcomes. Cell sheet transplantation showed improvement in LVEF and NYHA class in most studies. Cardiac-related readmission and adverse events of cell sheet transplantation range from 0 to 30.4%, all were nonfatal as no cardiac-related death was reported. Patient preoperative status seems can affect the patient's response to cell sheet therapy. Conclusion: Cell sheet transplantation can safely improve LVEF and NYHA class in ischemic heart disease patients, even in very low ejection fraction patients with unsuccessful standard therapy before. Further studies with better patient inclusion, larger population, and long-term follow-up required to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.