ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2023
Diagnostic evaluation of patients referred by family physicians with the suspicion of autism spectrum disorder.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current evidence shows that early interventions in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are more efficient and associated with better long-term outcomes. This also highlights the need for early recognition of children with ASD symptoms by family physicians and referral to child psychiatrists. This study aimed to evaluate how family physicians' knowledge about ASD is reflected in clinical practice by making a diagnostic evaluation of the cases referred with suspected ASD. The study included 149 cases that family physicians referred to child psychiatrists regarding the assessment for ASD. Diagnostic evaluation of the subjects was carried out using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria. Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) were used in the evaluation process. Denver II developmental screening inventory was used to evaluate all subjects under six. The mean age of all participants was 39.1 (±13.2) months, and in ASD cases, it was 34.6 (±7.8) months. Of all referred cases, 72,5% were diagnosed according to the DSM-5 criteria. The most common diagnoses were global developmental delay (28.9%), language disorder (15.4%), ASD (15.4%), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (8.7%), respectively. The most common reason for referral specified on the consultation note was delayed speech, with a rate of 87.2%. In addition, 148 (99.3%) of the symptoms noted on the referral note were clustered within the DSM-5 ASD A criteria and 19 (12.8%) within the ASD B criteria. Developmental delay was more prominent in cases with ASD when compared to those with global developmental delay and language disorder. The most common diagnosis was a global developmental delay in referred cases, and only some of the symptoms seen in ASD from the referral notes of family physicians stood out as the reason for referral. These results underline the necessity of continuing ASD training for family physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.