Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37885796›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Prevalence of Long-term Symptoms Varies When Using Different Post-COVID-19 Definitions in Positively and Negatively Tested Adults: The PRIME Post-COVID Study.

Demi M E Pagen, Céline J A van Bilsen, Stephanie Brinkhues, Maarten Van Herck, Kevin Konings, Casper D J den Heijer, Henriëtte L G Ter Waarbeek, Martijn A Spruit, Christian J P A Hoebe, Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05128695 (Long-term Public Health Consequences of Covid-19-- Physical, Mental and Social Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05128695 unknown statusnot on this map

Long-term Public Health Consequences of Covid-19-- Physical, Mental and Social Health

TypeobservationalSponsorPublic Health Service South LimburgRan2021 to 2025Enrolled60,000ConditionsCOVID-19Armsthere is no intervention, the study is observational
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Demi M E PagenDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Living Lab Public Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1475-5474
Céline J A van BilsenDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Living Lab Public Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Stephanie BrinkhuesDepartment of Knowledge & Innovation, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Maarten Van HerckDepartment of Research and Education, Ciro, Horn, the Netherlands.
Kevin KoningsDepartment of Process & Information Management, Communication & Automation, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Casper D J den HeijerDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Living Lab Public Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Henriëtte L G Ter WaarbeekDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Living Lab Public Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Martijn A SpruitDepartment of Research and Education, Ciro, Horn, the Netherlands.
Christian J P A HoebeDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Living Lab Public Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Nicole H T M Dukers-MuijrersDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, Living Lab Public Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, Heerlen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Long-term symptoms after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (ie, post-coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] condition or long COVID) constitute a substantial public health problem. Yet, the prevalence remains currently unclear as different case definitions are used, and negatively tested controls are lacking. We aimed to estimate post-COVID-19 condition prevalence using 6 definitions. Methods: The Prevalence, Risk factors, and Impact Evaluation (PRIME) post-COVID-19 condition study is a population-based sample of COVID-19-tested adults. In 2021, 61 655 adults were invited to complete an online questionnaire, including 44 symptoms plus a severity score (0-10) per symptom. Prevalence was calculated in both positively and negatively tested adults, stratified by time since their COVID-19 test (3-5, 6-11, or ≥12 months ago). Results: In positive individuals (n = 7405, 75.6%), the prevalence of long-term symptoms was between 26.9% and 64.1% using the 6 definitions, while in negative individuals (n = 2392, 24.4%), the prevalence varied between 11.4% and 32.5%. The prevalence of long-term symptoms potentially attributable to COVID-19 ranged from 17.9% to 26.3%. Conclusions: There is a (substantial) variation in prevalence estimates when using different post-COVID-19 condition definitions, as is current practice; there is limited overlap between definitions, indicating that the essential post-COVID-19 condition criteria are still unclear. Including negatives is important to determine long-term symptoms attributable to COVID-19. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05128695.

Indexed as

definitionslong-term symptomspost-COVID-19 condition

Identifiers

PMID37885796
PMCPMC10599319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.