Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37885539›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on YouTube Regarding Angiography and Angioplasty.

Tanya Nazar, Spurthy Namala, Rohit Rao Yelagapuri, Abhik Halder, Neera N Vora, Preyansh Doshi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanya NazarInternal Medicine, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, IND.
Spurthy NamalaInternal Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.
Rohit Rao YelagapuriIntensive Care Unit, Ramdev Rao Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Abhik HalderMedicine, IQ City Medical College and Narayana Multispecialty Hospital, Durgapur, IND.
Neera N VoraInternal Medicine, Gujarat Cancer Society (GCS) Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, IND.
Preyansh DoshiInternal Medicine, Gujarat Cancer Society (GCS) Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, IND.
CARE Hospitals · INGovernment College Kodanchery · INGovernment Medical College · INGujarat Cancer Society · INIQ Samhällsbyggnad · SENarayana Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Angiography is a method for defining the inner vessel wall and demonstrating flow through the lumen by detecting contrast injection into a blood vessel and projecting it onto a sequence of X-rays. This method is used to image the anatomical and architectural aspects of the vascular system. By employing balloon dilatation and the implantation of stents to widen the stenosed arteries, angioplasty is a form of minimally invasive endovascular treatment used to treat cardiovascular diseases and their consequences. People frequently rely on YouTube as a resource for awareness-raising and marketing activities. Animations and visual explanations can help patients understand the risks and benefits of procedures. Aims To assess the quality and reliability of the information on YouTube about angiography and angioplasty. We assessed quality using the GQS (Global Quality Scale) and reliability via the reliability score. Methodology This is an observational, cross-sectional study without the requirement of an ethics committee. It includes a questionnaire with predetermined criteria like time since upload, popularity, or type of uploader. The study assesses YouTube videos that include criteria using GQS and reliability scores. Responses recorded in Google Sheets were transferred to Microsoft Excel (Redmond, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. All six authors assessed 10 YouTube videos using specific keywords. The study includes videos that meet the inclusion criteria. Videos that did not include the inclusion criteria were excluded. Results After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 57 out of 60 videos were included. Of the total videos analyzed, the majority were uploaded by various hospitals and people other than doctors and healthcare organizations. About 78.95% of the videos described the reason for angiography/plasty, followed by the anatomical area involved and the pre-procedural preparation phase. There is a significant increase in the GQS score and reliability score among the videos uploaded by doctors, hospitals, healthcare organizations, and other groups. Conclusions Verified health information should be uploaded responsibly by doctors, hospitals, healthcare organizations, or other agencies on social media like YouTube in a manner that is easy to understand, has a high GQS, and has a high reliability score, as it would make it simpler for the general population or viewers to have access to important health-related content they can rely on. Videos should advise the viewers to contact their doctors for all queries regarding the diagnosis or treatment of their health concerns.

Indexed as

angiography and angioplastycardiologyglobal quality scoreminimally invasive interventional radiologyreliability scoreyoutube

Identifiers

PMID37885539
PMCPMC10598510
OpenAlexW4387023765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.