Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37885489›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator.

Austin R Gomindes, Elizabeth S Adeeko, Chetan Khatri, Imran Ahmed, Simran Sehdev, William John Carlos, Thomas Ward, James Leverington, Luke Debenham, Andrew Metcalfe and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interactive H5P content for increased student engagement in a dental hygiene program.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Austin R GomindesSchool of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Elizabeth S AdeekoTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
Chetan KhatriTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
Imran AhmedTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
Simran SehdevTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
William John CarlosTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
Thomas WardTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
James LeveringtonTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
Luke DebenhamTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
Andrew MetcalfeTrauma and Orthopaedics, University of Warwick, Warwick, GBR.
Jayne WardTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, GBR.
Birmingham Dental Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBWarwick Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Virtual reality (VR) simulation is a potential solution to the barriers surgical trainees are facing. There needs to be validation for its implementation within current training. We aimed to compare VR simulation to traditional methods in acquiring surgical skills for a TFN-ADVANCED™ Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA; DePuy Synthes, Auckland, New Zealand) femoral nailing system. Methods Thirty-one surgical trainees were randomised to two groups: traditional-training group (control group) and a VR-training group (intervention group) for insertion of a short cephalomedullary TFNA nail. Both groups then inserted the same TFNA system into saw-bone femurs. Surveys evaluated validity of the relevant activities, perception of simulation, confidence, stress and anxiety. The primary outcomes were tip-apex distance (TAD) and user anxiety/confidence levels. Secondary outcomes included number of screw- and nail-guidewire insertion attempts, the time taken to complete and user validity of the VR system. Results There was no statistical difference in TAD between the intervention and control groups (9mm vs 15mm, p=0.0734). The only TAD at risk of cut-out was in the control group (25mm). There was no statistical difference in time taken (2547.5ss vs 2395ss, p=0.668), nail guide-wire attempts (two for both groups, p=0.355) and screw guide-wire attempts (one for both groups, p=0.702). The control group versus intervention had higher anxiety levels (50% vs 33%) and had lower confidence (61% vs 84%). Interpretation There was no objective difference in performance on a saw-bone model between groups. However, this VR simulator resulted in more confidence and lower anxiety levels whilst performing a simulated TFNA. Whilst further studies with larger sample sizes and exploration of transfer validity to the operating theatre are required, this study does indicate potential benefits of VR within surgical training.

Indexed as

hapticsorthopaedics & traumatologyskills and simulation trainingtfn-advanced proximal femoral nailing system (tfna)training effectvirtual augmented realityvirtual reality in medical educationvirtual reality simulation

Identifiers

PMID37885489
PMCPMC10599600
OpenAlexW4387011057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.