Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37885482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Gait pattern after electromechanically-assisted gait training with the Hybrid Assistive Limb and conventional gait training in sub-acute stroke rehabilitation-A subsample from a randomized controlled trial.

Anneli Wall, Susanne Palmcrantz, Jörgen Borg, Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02410915 (Gait Training Early After Stroke - a Comparison Between Training With the Exoskeleton Hybrid Assistive Limb and Conventional Gait Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02410915 nacompletednot on this map

Gait Training Early After Stroke - a Comparison Between Training With the Exoskeleton Hybrid Assistive Limb and Conventional Gait Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanderyd HospitalRan2014 to 2017Enrolled32ConditionsStroke, Gait, Hemiplegic, Ambulation Difficulty, HemiparesisArmsHybrid Assistive Limb (HAL), gait training, Control Group, Conventional gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Robot-assisted gait training in stroke.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anneli WallDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine Stockholm, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanne PalmcrantzDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jörgen BorgDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elena M Gutierrez-FarewikKTH MoveAbility Lab, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEDanderyds sjukhus · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electromechanically-assisted gait training has been introduced in stroke rehabilitation as a means to enable gait training with a large number of reproducible and symmetrical task repetitions, i.e. steps. However, few studies have evaluated its impact on gait pattern functions. This study includes persons with no independent ambulation function at the start of a 4-week neurorehabilitation period in the sub-acute phase after stroke. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate whether the addition of electromechanically-assisted gait training to conventional training resulted in better gait pattern function than conventional training alone. The secondary aim was to identify correlations between overall gait quality and standardized clinical assessments. Participants and methods: Seventeen patients with no independent ambulation function who participated in a Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-point study in the sub-acute phase after stroke were randomized into two groups; one group ( Results: Both the CONV and HAL groups exhibited similar gait patterns with no significant differences between groups in any kinematic, kinetic parameters or other spatiotemporal metrics. The GPS for the paretic limb had a median (IQR) of 12.9° (7.8°) and 13.4° (4.3°) for the CONV and HAL groups, respectively ( Discussion: This finding raises new questions about how to best design effective and optimal post-stroke rehabilitation programs in patients with moderate to severe gait impairments to achieve both independent walking and optimal gait pattern function, and about which patients should be in focus in further studies on the efficacy of electromechanically-assisted gait training. Clinical trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT02410915) on April 2015.

Indexed as

exoskeletongait retraininginterventionneurorehabilitationrobotics

Identifiers

PMID37885482
PMCPMC10598624
OpenAlexW4387518997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.