ArticleBiophysical journal2023
Extract latent features of single-particle trajectories with historical experience learning.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of Machine Learning for Single-Particle Tracking: Methods, Challenges, and Biophysical Insights.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Single-Molecule Tracking Analysis of Superresolution Optical Microscopy Data.Cells · 2026Review
- Deep learning in chromatin organization: from super-resolution microscopy to clinical applications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Review
- High-fidelity predictions of diffusion in the brain microenvironment.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-particle tracking has enabled real-time, in situ quantitative studies of complex systems. However, inferring dynamic state changes from noisy and undersampling trajectories encounters challenges. Here, we introduce a data-driven method for extracting features of subtrajectories with historical experience learning (Deep-SEES), where a single-particle tracking analysis pipeline based on a self-supervised architecture automatically searches for the latent space, allowing effective segmentation of the underlying states from noisy trajectories without prior knowledge on the particle dynamics. We validated our method on a variety of noisy simulated and experimental data. Our results showed that the method can faithfully capture both stable states and their dynamic switch. In highly random systems, our method outperformed commonly used unsupervised methods in inferring motion states, which is important for understanding nanoparticles interacting with living cell membranes, active enzymes, and liquid-liquid phase separation. Self-generating latent features of trajectories could potentially improve the understanding, estimation, and prediction of many complex systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.