ReviewThrombosis journal2023
The clinical application of venous ultrasound in diagnosis and follow-up of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT): a case-based discussion.
Review in Thrombosis journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-biomarker nomogram based on miR-155-5p and NETs predicting deep vein thrombosis risk stratification.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- Application effect of whole-process nursing model based on smart healthcare mode in patients undergoing Mako robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Characterization of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis via Advanced Ultrasound Elastography: A Prospective Pilot Study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and evaluation of a risk prediction model for postoperative deep vein thrombosis in gynecological patients.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025Article
- [Analysis of correlation between Barthel index score and preoperative occurrence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty revision surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Expert-Based Narrative Review on Compression UltraSonography (CUS) for Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Two sides of the coin: coagulation and inflammation in deep vein thrombosis - a prospective study on D-dimer and SIRI.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Construction of a nomogram for preoperative deep vein thrombosis in pelvic fracture patients.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current clinical practice guidelines lack explicit guidance on the indications and appropriate timing of venous ultrasound (US) in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) follow-up. Moreover, abnormal findings reported on venous US in DVT follow-up or suspected recurrent DVT may be difficult for clinicians to interpret, which carries risk of harm from inappropriate use of anti- coagulation and increased healthcare resource utilization. Due to the above factors, over-use of ultrasound in diagnosis and follow-up of lower extremity DVT has been reported in western health systems. We have undertaken a case-based discussion and a scoping review of existing guidelines on the use of venousUS following prior diagnosis of DVT, to guide appropriate interpretation of commonly reported US abnormalities and provide our suggestions in the light of best available evidence on appropriate timing to perform follow-up US in management of lower extremity DVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.