Perceptions and factors associated with the uptake of the community client-led antiretroviral therapy delivery model (CCLAD) at a large urban clinic in Uganda: a mixed methods study.

introductionCommunity Client-Led ART Delivery (CCLAD) is a community HIV care model. In this model, a group of persons living with HIV (PLHIV) in a specific location, take turns going to the HIV clinic to pick up Antiretroviral Treatment refills for members. The uptake of this model, however, remains low despite its improvements in patient retention. In this study, we explored PLHIV's perceptions of this model and identified the factors associated with its low uptake.

methodsThis was a mixed methods study based on a retrospective review of records of PLHIV and in-depth interviews. We reviewed the medical records of people receiving ART to determine their current model of ART delivery and conducted in-depth interviews with 30 participants who were eligible to be enrolled in the CCLAD model at the Mulago ISS clinic. We performed logistic regression to identify factors associated with the uptake of the CCLAD model and inductive thematic analysis to explore PLHIV's perceptions of the CCLAD model.

resultsA total of 776 PLHIV were sampled for the study, 545 (70.2%) of whom were female. The mean age (standard deviation) was 42 (± 9.3) years. Overall, 55 (7.1%) received ART using the CCLAD model. Compared to other ART-delivery models, CCLAD was associated with being on ART for at least eight years (AOR 3.72; 95% CI: 1.35-10.25) and having no prior missed clinic appointments (AOR 10.68; 95% CI: 3.31-34.55). Mixed perceptions were expressed about the CCLAD model. Participants interviewed appreciated CCLAD for its convenience and the opportunities it offered members to talk and support each other. Others however, expressed concerns about the process of group formation, and feeling detached from the health facility with consequences of lack of confidentiality.

conclusionThe current uptake of the CCLAD model is lower than the national recommended percentage of 15%. Its uptake was associated with those who had been in care for a longer period and who did not miss appointments. Despite CCLAD being perceived as convenient and as promoting support among members, several challenges were expressed. These included complexities of group formation, fear of stigma and feelings of detachment from health facilities among others. So, while CCLAD presents a promising alternative ART delivery model, more attention needs to be paid to the processes of group formation and improved patient monitoring to address the feelings of detachment from the facility and facility staff.