Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37885005›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Using video-based examiner score comparison and adjustment (VESCA) to compare the influence of examiners at different sites in a distributed objective structured clinical exam (OSCE).

Peter Yeates, Adriano Maluf, Natalie Cope, Gareth McCray, Stuart McBain, Dominic Beardow, Richard Fuller, Robert Bob McKinley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simulation-based evaluation of emergency medicine residents' preparedness for toxic terrorism.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter YeatesSchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK. p.yeates@keele.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6316-4051
Adriano MalufSchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-0533
Natalie CopeSchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2053-0474
Gareth McCraySchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Stuart McBainSchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Dominic BeardowSchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Richard FullerChristie Education, Christie Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester , UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-4864
Robert Bob McKinleySchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-3435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnsuring equivalence of examiners' judgements within distributed objective structured clinical exams (OSCEs) is key to both fairness and validity but is hampered by lack of cross-over in the performances which different groups of examiners observe. This study develops a novel method called Video-based Examiner Score Comparison and Adjustment (VESCA) using it to compare examiners scoring from different OSCE sites for the first time. MATERIALS/

methodsWithin a summative 16 station OSCE, volunteer students were videoed on each station and all examiners invited to score station-specific comparator videos in addition to usual student scoring. Linkage provided through the video-scores enabled use of Many Facet Rasch Modelling (MFRM) to compare 1/ examiner-cohort and 2/ site effects on students' scores.

resultsExaminer-cohorts varied by 6.9% in the overall score allocated to students of the same ability. Whilst only a tiny difference was apparent between sites, examiner-cohort variability was greater in one site than the other. Adjusting student scores produced a median change in rank position of 6 places (0.48 deciles), however 26.9% of students changed their rank position by at least 1 decile. By contrast, only 1 student's pass/fail classification was altered by score adjustment.

conclusionsWhilst comparatively limited examiner participation rates may limit interpretation of score adjustment in this instance, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using VESCA for quality assurance purposes in large scale distributed OSCEs.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceHumansAssessmentDistributed AssessmentEquivalenceExaminer-CohortsOSCE

Identifiers

PMID37885005
PMCPMC10605484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.