Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884966›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Assessment of the availability, accessibility, and quality of sexual and reproductive health services for young people in conflict affected zones of Cameroon: a mixed method study.

Roseline Dzekem Dine, Valentine Uwamahoro, James Olasunkanmi Oladapo, Gilbert Eshun, Fortune Benjamin Effiong, Frank Kyei-Arthur, Ayuk Bertrand Tambe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Roseline Dzekem DineRinda Ubuzima, Kigali, Rwanda. dineroselinedzekem@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8210-9258
Valentine UwamahoroJhpiego, Kigali, Rwanda.
James Olasunkanmi OladapoLadoke Akintola University of Technology Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Gilbert EshunSeventh-Day Adventist Hospital, Agona, Asamang, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9836-0834
Fortune Benjamin EffiongUniversity of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Frank Kyei-ArthurUniversity of Environment and Sustainable Development, Somanya, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9794-8524
Ayuk Bertrand TambeUniversity of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5023-4273
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology · NGMinistry of Infrastructure · RWUniversity of Buea · CMUniversity of Calabar · NGUniversity of Environment and Sustainable Development

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite ongoing programs to improve young people's Sexual and Reproductive Health Services (SRHS) in the conflict plagued North West and South West Regions of Cameroon, there is limited evidence-based information evaluating SRHS. This study, therefore, aims to investigate the availability, accessibility, and quality of SRHS provided to young people in the North West and South West Regions of Cameroon.

methodThis is a cross-sectional mixed-methods sequential explanatory study conducted among healthcare providers and young people between 10 and 24 years in 6 selected urban and rural areas in North West and South West regions. Data was collected between December 2021 and September 2022 using an adopted checklist. A descriptive analysis was conducted for quantitative data. An inductive analysis was conducted for the qualitative data to construct themes. The findings from the quantitative and qualitative responses were triangulated.

resultsThere were 114 participants, 28 healthcare providers and 86 young people. Most provider participants were nurses (n = 18, 64.3%), working in religious facilities (n = 14, 50.0%), with diplomas as state registered nurses (n = 9, 32.1%). Also, more than half of young people (51.2%) were less than 20 years old, while there were more male young people (51.2%) than female young people (48.8%). Most respondents agreed that SRHS services were available, though they think they are not designed for young people and have limited awareness campaigns about the services. Reasons such as limited use of written guidelines, affected quality of SRHS. Participants revealed shyness, resistance from religious groups and families, insecurities from political instability, and inadequate training, among others, as barriers to SRH accessibility.

conclusionThe study shows that SRHS are available but are not specifically designed for young people. Inadequate publicity for these services, coupled with the political crises and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, has increased young people's inaccessibility to SRHS. Young people usually have to finance the cost of most of the SRHS. The quality of service delivery in the facilities is inadequate and must therefore be improved by developing safe, youth-friendly centers staffed with well-trained service providers.

Indexed as

PandemicsReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAdultCameroonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorYoung AdultAccessibilityAvailabilityBarriersKnowledgeQualitySexual and Reproductive HealthUnderstandingYoung people

Identifiers

PMID37884966
PMCPMC10601185
OpenAlexW4387958349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.