ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Proteomic study of aqueous humour in diabetic patients with cataracts by TMT combined with HPLC-MS/MS.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crosstalk between endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial homeostasis: A new perspective on ophthalmic disease treatment.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2026Review
- Protein biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension: advances, clinical relevance, and translational challenges.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Antioxidant Support for the Corneal Endothelium: Evidence from Vitamin C Supplementation in Hard Cataract Phacoemulsification.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Recurrence of macular edema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion: a proteomic study.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study is to identify the proteomic differences between the aqueous humour of diabetes patients with cataracts and that of non-diabetic sufferers of cataracts in a clinical setting.
methodsPatients were divided into the diabetic experimental group and the non-diabetic control group. Aqueous humour specimens were obtained via cataract surgery. Sample proteins were treated with a TMT reagent, separated using a cation chromatography column, and analysed using a C18 desalting column. Proteins were identified using HPLC-MS/MS. The differential proteins were identified using both a p value of < 0.05 and a fold change of > 1.2. GO classification enrichment analysis, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, protein interaction network analysis, and ingenuity pathway analysis were all carried out. The expression level of four differential proteins were verified by Western blot, and GC and TTR expressions were further examined using an expanded sample pool.
resultsThe postprandial glucose levels between the experimental group (9.40 ± 1.35 mmol/L) and the control group (6.56 ± 0.81 mmol/L) were significantly different, with a p value of 1.16E-06. It is important to note, however, that the baseline levels of the parameters showed no statistical differences. In total, 397 aqueous humour proteins were identified; of these, 137 showed significant differences, with 63 upregulated ones and 74 down-regulated ones. The differential proteins play important roles in numerous biological processes and pathways, such as complement and coagulation cascades (p = 1.71E-09). Some of these differential proteins are associated with diabetic retinal degeneration and other diabetic complications. Differential proteins, such as HP, GC, and TTR, have high node degree in the protein interaction network. Western blot results further confirmed that GC were down-regulated while TTR was up-regulated in aqueous humour under diabetic condition.
conclusionA list of differential proteins in the human aqueous humour of diabetic patients was established. Proteins with high interaction scores as per protein interaction analysis, such as GC and TTR, were further verified and could potentially be used as early diagnostic markers for diabetic eye complications in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.