Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884877›Full record

SynthesisBMC bioinformatics2023

Deep learning, radiomics and radiogenomics applications in the digital breast tomosynthesis: a systematic review.

Sadam Hussain, Yareth Lafarga-Osuna, Mansoor Ali, Usman Naseem, Masroor Ahmed, Jose Gerardo Tamez-Peña

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic Value ofTechnology in cancer research & treatment
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sadam HussainSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico. a01753094@tec.mx.
Yareth Lafarga-OsunaSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico.
Mansoor AliSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico.
Usman NaseemCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Masroor AhmedSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico.
Jose Gerardo Tamez-PeñaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico.
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MXJames Cook University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advancements in computing power and state-of-the-art algorithms have helped in more accessible and accurate diagnosis of numerous diseases. In addition, the development of de novo areas in imaging science, such as radiomics and radiogenomics, have been adding more to personalize healthcare to stratify patients better. These techniques associate imaging phenotypes with the related disease genes. Various imaging modalities have been used for years to diagnose breast cancer. Nonetheless, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), a state-of-the-art technique, has produced promising results comparatively. DBT, a 3D mammography, is replacing conventional 2D mammography rapidly. This technological advancement is key to AI algorithms for accurately interpreting medical images. OBJECTIVE AND

methodsThis paper presents a comprehensive review of deep learning (DL), radiomics and radiogenomics in breast image analysis. This review focuses on DBT, its extracted synthetic mammography (SM), and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Furthermore, this survey provides systematic knowledge about DL, radiomics, and radiogenomics for beginners and advanced-level researchers.

resultsA total of 500 articles were identified, with 30 studies included as the set criteria. Parallel benchmarking of radiomics, radiogenomics, and DL models applied to the DBT images could allow clinicians and researchers alike to have greater awareness as they consider clinical deployment or development of new models. This review provides a comprehensive guide to understanding the current state of early breast cancer detection using DBT images.

conclusionUsing this survey, investigators with various backgrounds can easily seek interdisciplinary science and new DL, radiomics, and radiogenomics directions towards DBT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningBreastFemaleHumansMammographyRadiographic Image EnhancementBreast cancerDeep learningDigital breast tomosynthesisLesion classificationLesion detectionMedical imagingRadiogenomicsRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37884877
PMCPMC10605943
OpenAlexW4387955477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.