ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2023
Sarcopenia classification model for musculoskeletal patients using smart insole and artificial intelligence gait analysis.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sarcopenia screening based on the assessment of gait with inertial measurement units: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Comparing Stability, Gait, and Functional Score after 40-mm Dual-Mobility Hip Arthroplasty to 36-mm Head Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2025Trial
- AI-Based Measurement Tools for Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Noise-robust markerless video gait anomaly detection via two-stage acquisition and LSTM autoencoders.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SarcoNet: A Pilot Study on Integrating Clinical and Kinematic Features for Sarcopenia Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearable devices in neurological disorders: a narrative review of status quo and perspectives.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Cross-sectional study comparing smart insoles and manual methods for short physical performance battery in hip fracture patients.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Gait-Based AI Models for Detecting Sarcopenia and Cognitive Decline Using Sensor Fusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Recent Update on the Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Koreans: Findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Journal of bone metabolism · 2024Article
- Sarcopenia diagnosis using skeleton-based gait sequence and foot-pressure image datasets.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Sarcopenia classification model for musculoskeletal patients using smart insole and artificial intelligence gait analysis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between physical function, musculoskeletal disorders and sarcopenia is intricate. Current physical function tests, such as the gait speed test and the chair stand test, have limitations in eliminating subjective influences. To overcome this, smart devices utilizing inertial measurement unit sensors and artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods are being developed.
methodsWe employed cutting-edge technologies, including the smart insole device and pose estimation based on AI, along with three classification models: random forest (RF), support vector machine and artificial neural network, to classify control and sarcopenia groups. Patient data of 83 individuals were divided into train and test sets, with approximately 67% allocated for training. Classification models were implemented using RStudio, considering individual and combined variables obtained through pose estimation and smart insole measurements.
resultsPerformance evaluation of the classification models utilized accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score indicators. Using only pose estimation variables, accuracy ranged from 0.92 to 0.96, with F1-scores of 0.94-0.97. Key variables identified by the RF model were 'Hip_dif', 'Ankle_dif' and 'Hipankle_dif'. Combining variables from both methods increased accuracy to 0.80-1.00, with F1-scores of 0.73-1.00.
conclusionsIn our study, a classification model that integrates smart insole and pose estimation technology was assessed. The RF model showed impressive results, particularly in the case of the Hip and Ankle variables. The growth of advanced measurement technologies suggests a promising avenue for identifying and utilizing additional digital biomarkers in the management of various disorders. The convergence of AI technologies with diagnostics and treatment approaches a promising future for enhanced interventions in conditions like sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.