Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884810›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

Association of Patient Satisfaction with Cataract Grading in Five Types of Multifocal IOLs.

Sana Niazi, Zisis Gatzioufas, Sorcha N Dhubhghaill, Majid Moshirfar, Amir Faramarzi, Farzad Mohammadi, Bahar Kheiri, Alireza Peyman, Mohammad Heidari, Farideh Doroodgar

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sana Niazi *Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Zisis Gatzioufas *University Eye Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sorcha N DhubhghaillAntwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Majid MoshirfarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Amir FaramarziDepartment of Ophthalmology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Farzad MohammadiTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Bahar KheiriUniversity Eye Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Alireza PeymanIsfahan Eye Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad HeidariDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Farideh DoroodgarTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. f-doroodgar@farabi.tums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0002-3758-0569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study investigated patient satisfaction levels in five premium intraocular lenses (IOLs). A secondary aim was to determine whether patient satisfaction was associated with the cataract grade before lens surgery.

methodsIn this multicenter prospective comparative study, 164 patients from diverse backgrounds underwent cataract surgery and were assigned for identical bilateral implantation of multifocal IOLs. In addition to visual performance, quality of life was measured using the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality Of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL 42) scoring questionnaire. The Sirius Scheimpflug Analyzer was used to evaluate the posterior cornea and aberrations. Finally, the association of patient satisfaction reports with the Pentacam Cataract Grading Scale (PCGS) and Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS III) was evaluated.

resultsA considerable subjective improvement was observed in uncorrected far, near (40 cm), and intermediate (60 cm) visual acuity in the five groups (P values < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity between Symfony, Trinova, and AT LISA at the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree, favoring Symfony (P < 0.001). PanOptix users had considerably lower mean coma values (P < 0.001), while AT LISA users had lower mean spherical aberrations (P = 0.009) compared to the other groups. No additional safety concerns relating to IOLs were recorded. Mean satisfaction had a high correlation with LOCS and Pentacam Nuclear Staging (PNS) in each lens group, e.g., correlation coefficient and P value for AT LISA were respectively r = 0.99, P < 0.001 and r = 0.97, P = 0.004.

conclusionDespite discrepancies between groups of lenses, most patients who received multifocal IOLs reported satisfaction at more than 3 years after the initial operation. A growing number of patients with cataracts are seeking spectacle-free vision with presbyopia-correcting IOLs. Hence, the high satisfaction rate among patients with cataract could indicate the value of offering a wider range of available lenses.

Indexed as

CataractLenses, IntraocularMultifocal Intraocular LensesHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeAberrometryCataractContrast sensitivityIntraocularLens crystallineLens implantationPatient satisfactionQuality of lifeVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID37884810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.