Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884803›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2023

Control Banding and the Global Rise of Qualitative Risk Assessment Strategies.

Juliana H Halbach, John M Cala, Samuel Y Paik, David M Zalk

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana H HalbachLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, L-449, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA. halbach1@llnl.gov.
John M CalaLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, L-178, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Samuel Y PaikLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, L-382, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
David M ZalkUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewControl banding (CB) is a risk assessment strategy that has been applied globally to a variety of occupational hazards. This article describes how this method can be applied, recent developments in the CB literature, an example of how it is utilized for a large, diverse worksite, and where the future of CB is headed. RECENT

findingsOver the past several years, the applications of CB have widened significantly and have accordingly helped bolster the public and occupational safety, health, and hygiene (OSHH) professionals' understanding of occupational exposure to various hazards. The fields of workplace chemicals, nanomaterials, and airborne pathogens (i.e., COVID-19), specifically have seen remarkable increases in the development of CB tools. Extensive CB tool validation efforts have also lent increasing credibility to this alternative approach. CB is a simplified strategy of assessing occupational exposures and providing commensurate controls and solutions to reduce workplace risks. CB can be used as a primary or tiered risk assessment and risk management approach which can be utilized by both OSHH professionals and nonexperts alike to identify solutions for reducing work-related exposures. The need for health and safety expertise will continue to grow as technological advancements, environmental changes, and economic forces increase workplace hazard complexity, and CB will continue to be a useful tool for those performing risk assessments.

Indexed as

NanostructuresOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthHumansRisk AssessmentWorkplaceChemical safetyControl bandingEngineered nanoparticlesOccupational exposure bandingOccupational risk managementQualitative risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37884803
OpenAlexW4387966115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.