Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884779›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2024

Transfer of statistical learning from passive speech perception to speech production.

Timothy K Murphy, Nazbanou Nozari, Lori L Holt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Speech motor control is not sequestered from general auditory processes.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Speech Perception is Speech Learning.Current directions in psychological science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is working memory domain-general or domain-specific?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy K MurphyDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Baker Hall, Floor 3, Frew St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. tkmurphy@andrew.cmu.edu.
Nazbanou NozariDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Lori L HoltDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USIndiana University Bloomington · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Predoctoral Training Program in Behavioral Brain ResearchT32GM081760 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A, HOLT, LORI L · 2007 to 2021
$4.3M
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences BCS-1941357Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences BCS-2217415NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM081760NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communicating with a speaker with a different accent can affect one's own speech. Despite the strength of evidence for perception-production transfer in speech, the nature of transfer has remained elusive, with variable results regarding the acoustic properties that transfer between speakers and the characteristics of the speakers who exhibit transfer. The current study investigates perception-production transfer through the lens of statistical learning across passive exposure to speech. Participants experienced a short sequence of acoustically variable minimal pair (beer/pier) utterances conveying either an accent or typical American English acoustics, categorized a perceptually ambiguous test stimulus, and then repeated the test stimulus aloud. In the canonical condition, /b/-/p/ fundamental frequency (F0) and voice onset time (VOT) covaried according to typical English patterns. In the reverse condition, the F0xVOT relationship reversed to create an "accent" with speech input regularities atypical of American English. Replicating prior studies, F0 played less of a role in perceptual speech categorization in reverse compared with canonical statistical contexts. Critically, this down-weighting transferred to production, with systematic down-weighting of F0 in listeners' own speech productions in reverse compared with canonical contexts that was robust across male and female participants. Thus, the mapping of acoustics to speech categories is rapidly adjusted by short-term statistical learning across passive listening and these adjustments transfer to influence listeners' own speech productions.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleSpeech AcousticsTransfer, PsychologyYoung AdultAuditory word repetitionPhonetic convergencePhonetic cue weightingSpeech perceptionSpeech productionStatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID37884779
PMCPMC11192850
OpenAlexW4387965724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.