ArticleSpine deformity2024
Utility of postoperative laboratory testing after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWith advancements to blood management strategies, risk of perioperative transfusion following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has diminished. We hypothesize that routine laboratory testing on postoperative-day 1 (POD1) and beyond is unnecessary. The purpose of this study is to determine necessity of POD1 labs, particularly hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, following surgical management of AIS.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive AIS patients aged 11-19 who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) at a single institution. Univariable logistic regression was utilized to determine factors associated with hematocrit ≤ 22% on POD1 or a postoperative transfusion. Firth's penalized logistic regression was used for any separation in data. Youden's index was utilized to determine the optimal point on the ROC curve that maximizes both sensitivity and specificity.
results527 patients qualified for this study. Among the eight total patients with POD1 hematocrit ≤ 22, none underwent transfusion. These patients had lower last intraoperative hematocrit levels compared to patients with POD1 hematocrit > 22% (24.1% vs 31.5%, p < 0.001), and these groups showed no difference in preoperative hematocrit levels (38.2% vs 39.8%, p = 0.11). Four patients underwent postoperative transfusion. Both preoperative hematocrit levels (34.0% vs 39.9%, p = 0.001) and last intraoperative hematocrit levels (25.1% vs 31.4%, p = 0.002) were lower compared to patients without transfusion. Intraoperative hematocrit < 26.2%, operative time of more than 35.8 min per level fused, or cell salvage > 241 cc were significant risk factors for postoperative transfusion.
conclusionTransfusion after PSF for AIS is exceedingly rare. POD1 labs should be considered when last intraoperative hematocrit < 26%, operative time per level fused > 35 min, or cell salvage amount > 241 cc. Otherwise, unless symptomatic, patients do not benefit from postoperative laboratory screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.