ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal resection for benign retroperitoneal tumors: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening criteria for drainage-free patients after retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenal tumor resection and their prospective validation study value.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Utility of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Surgery for Retroperitoneal Tumors.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveBenign retroperitoneal tumors (BRTs) are clinically rare solid tumors. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal resection for BRTs.
methodsThe clinical data of 43 patients who had pathologically confirmed BRTs and underwent laparoscopic resection in a single center from January 2019 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: the Transperitoneal approach group (n = 24) and the Retroperitoneal approach group (n = 19). The clinical characteristics and perioperative data between the two groups were compared. The baseline data and surgical variables were analyzed to determine the impact of different surgical approaches on the treatment outcomes of BRTs.
resultsNo significant difference was observed between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of underlying diseases, tumor size, tumor position, operation duration, intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative hospital stay, intestinal function recovery time, and postoperative complication rate. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was significantly lower in the Transperitoneal approach group than in the Retroperitoneal approach group (1/24 vs. 5/19, χ
conclusionThe laparoscopic transperitoneal approach has the inherent advantages of anatomical hierarchies and surgical space, providing a better optical perspective of the targeted mass and improved bleeding control. This approach may have better efficacy than the retroperitoneal approach, especially in cases of a large tumor or when the tumor is located near important blood vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.