Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884632›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Validation and evaluation of subject-specific finite element models of the pediatric knee.

Ayda Karimi Dastgerdi, Amir Esrafilian, Christopher P Carty, Azadeh Nasseri, Alireza Yahyaiee Bavil, Martina Barzan, Rami K Korhonen, Ivan Astori, Wayne Hall, David John Saxby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In Pursuit of Quantifying Patient Knee Contact Mechanics: Finite Element Model Validation of Cadaveric Knees in Axially Loaded MRI Scans.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayda Karimi DastgerdiGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and the Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADAPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. ayda.karimidastgerdi@griffithuni.edu.au.
Amir EsrafilianDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Christopher P CartyGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and the Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADAPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Azadeh NasseriGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and the Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADAPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Alireza Yahyaiee BavilGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and the Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADAPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Martina BarzanGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and the Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADAPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Rami K KorhonenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Ivan AstoriDepartment of Orthopedics, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Wayne HallSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
David John SaxbyGriffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland and the Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADAPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Griffith University · AUChildren’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element (FE) models have been widely used to investigate knee joint biomechanics. Most of these models have been developed to study adult knees, neglecting pediatric populations. In this study, an atlas-based approach was employed to develop subject-specific FE models of the knee for eight typically developing pediatric individuals. Initially, validation simulations were performed at four passive tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) flexion angles, and the resulting TFJ and patellofemoral joint (PFJ) kinematics were compared to corresponding patient-matched measurements derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A neuromusculoskeletal-(NMSK)-FE pipeline was then used to simulate knee biomechanics during stance phase of walking gait for each participant to evaluate model simulation of a common motor task. Validation simulations demonstrated minimal error and strong correlations between FE-predicted and MRI-measured TFJ and PFJ kinematics (ensemble average of root mean square errors < 5 mm for translations and < 4.1° for rotations). The FE-predicted kinematics were strongly correlated with published reports (ensemble average of Pearson's correlation coefficients (ρ) > 0.9 for translations and ρ > 0.8 for rotations), except for TFJ mediolateral translation and abduction/adduction rotation. For walking gait, NMSK-FE model-predicted knee kinematics, contact areas, and contact pressures were consistent with experimental reports from literature. The strong agreement between model predictions and experimental reports underscores the capability of sequentially linked NMSK-FE models to accurately predict pediatric knee kinematics, as well as complex contact pressure distributions across the TFJ articulations. These models hold promise as effective tools for parametric analyses, population-based clinical studies, and enhancing our understanding of various pediatric knee injury mechanisms. They also support intervention design and prediction of surgical outcomes in pediatric populations.

Indexed as

Knee JointPatellofemoral JointAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFinite Element AnalysisHumansKneeMagnetic Resonance ImagingRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID37884632
PMCPMC10603053
OpenAlexW4387965690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.