Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884507›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Early selection of task-relevant features through population gating.

Joao Barbosa, Rémi Proville, Chris C Rodgers, Michael R DeWeese, Srdjan Ostojic, Yves Boubenec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Structure of activity in multiregion recurrent neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joao BarbosaLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, INSERM U960, Ecole Normale Superieure - PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France. palerma@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1907-3010
Rémi ProvilleTailored Data Solutions, 192 Cours Gambetta, 84300, Cavaillon, France.
Chris C RodgersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30033, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-3450
Michael R DeWeeseDepartment of Physics, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, and Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Srdjan OstojicLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, INSERM U960, Ecole Normale Superieure - PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-1223
Yves BoubenecLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure PSL Research University, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-6947

Funding

Coordinating Structure and Function for Neuronal Computations Mediating Context-Dependent BehaviorUF1NS122123 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PESARAN, BIJAN · 2021 to 2021
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS122123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brains can gracefully weed out irrelevant stimuli to guide behavior. This feat is believed to rely on a progressive selection of task-relevant stimuli across the cortical hierarchy, but the specific across-area interactions enabling stimulus selection are still unclear. Here, we propose that population gating, occurring within primary auditory cortex (A1) but controlled by top-down inputs from prelimbic region of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), can support across-area stimulus selection. Examining single-unit activity recorded while rats performed an auditory context-dependent task, we found that A1 encoded relevant and irrelevant stimuli along a common dimension of its neural space. Yet, the relevant stimulus encoding was enhanced along an extra dimension. In turn, mPFC encoded only the stimulus relevant to the ongoing context. To identify candidate mechanisms for stimulus selection within A1, we reverse-engineered low-rank RNNs trained on a similar task. Our analyses predicted that two context-modulated neural populations gated their preferred stimulus in opposite contexts, which we confirmed in further analyses of A1. Finally, we show in a two-region RNN how population gating within A1 could be controlled by top-down inputs from PFC, enabling flexible across-area communication despite fixed inter-areal connectivity.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexBrainAcoustic StimulationAnimalsPrefrontal CortexRats

Identifiers

PMID37884507
PMCPMC10603060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.