Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37884178›Full record

ArticleSteroids2023

Navigating a plethora of progesterone receptors: Comments on the safety/risk of progesterone supplementation in women with a history of breast cancer or at high-risk for developing breast cancer.

Caroline H Diep, Laura J Mauro, Carol A Lange

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Steroids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline H DiepDepartment of Medicine (Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation) and Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Laura J MauroDepartment of Medicine (Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation) and Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Carol A LangeDepartment of Medicine (Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation) and Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: lange047@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Progesterone Receptor (PR) Signaling Cross Talk Drives ER+ Breast CancerR01CA229697 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Carol A Lange, Douglas Yee · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
SRC-3/PELP1 complexes drive stem-like phenotypes in luminal breast cancerR01CA236948 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LANGE, CAROL A, OSTRANDER, JULIE H · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229697NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progesterone and progestin agonists are potent steroid hormones. There are at least three major types of progesterone receptor (PR) families that interact with and respond to progesterone or progestin ligands. These receptors include ligand-activated transcription factor isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) encoded by the PGR gene, often termed classical or nuclear progesterone receptor (nPR), membrane-spanning progesterone receptor membrane component proteins known as PGRMC1/2, and a large family of progestin/adipoQreceptors or PAQRs (also called membrane PRs or mPRs). Cross-talk between mPRs and nPRs has also been reported. The complexity of progesterone actions via a plethora of diverse receptors warrants careful consideration of the clinical applications of progesterone, which primarily include birth control formulations in young women and hormone replacement therapy following menopause. Herein, we focus on the benefits and risk of progesterone/progestin supplementation. We conclude that progesterone-only supplementation is considered safe for most reproductive-age women. However, women who currently have ER + breast cancer or have had such cancer in the past should not take sex hormones, including progesterone. Women at high-risk for developing breast or ovarian cancer, either due to their family history or known genetic factors (such as BRCA1/2 mutation) or hormonal conditions, should avoid exogenous sex hormones and proceed with caution when considering using natural hormones to mitigate menopausal symptoms and/or improve quality of life after menopause. These individuals are urged to consult with a qualified OB-GYN physician to thoroughly assess the risks and benefits of sex hormone supplementation. As new insights into the homeostatic roles and specificity of highly integrated rapid signaling and nPR actions are revealed, we are hopeful that the benefits of using progesterone use may be fully realized without an increased risk of women's cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsProgesteroneBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMembrane ProteinsProgestinsQuality of LifeReceptors, ProgesteroneBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsPGRMC1 protein, humanProgesteroneProgestinsReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerProgesteroneProgesterone receptorProgestinRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37884178
PMCPMC10842046
OpenAlexW4387899412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.