Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37883810›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical theory and computation2023

Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.

Song Xia, Eric Chen, Yingkai Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molegro Data Modeller for Machine Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Song XiaDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.
Eric ChenDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.
Yingkai ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York 10003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-3354

Funding

Computational modulator design and machine learning to target protein-protein interactionsR35GM127040 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Yingkai Zhang · 2018 to 2026
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern therapeutic development often involves several stages that are interconnected, and multiple iterations are usually required to bring a new drug to the market. Computational approaches have increasingly become an indispensable part of helping reduce the time and cost of the research and development of new drugs. In this Perspective, we summarize our recent efforts on integrating molecular modeling and machine learning to develop computational tools for modulator design, including a pocket-guided rational design approach based on AlphaSpace to target protein-protein interactions, delta machine learning scoring functions for protein-ligand docking as well as virtual screening, and state-of-the-art deep learning models to predict calculated and experimental molecular properties based on molecular mechanics optimized geometries. Meanwhile, we discuss remaining challenges and promising directions for further development and use a retrospective example of FDA approved kinase inhibitor Erlotinib to demonstrate the use of these newly developed computational tools.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMachine LearningLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsRetrospective StudiesLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID37883810
PMCPMC10653122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.