Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37883664›Full record

ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2024

Soybean-Phakopsora pachyrhizi interactions: towards the development of next-generation disease-resistant plants.

Aline Sartor Chicowski, Melissa Bredow, Alice Satiko Utiyama, Francismar Corrêa Marcelino-Guimarães, Steven A Whitham

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrastructural Examination of the Fungus-To-Fungus Interactions ofPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrative identification of key genes governingFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline Sartor Chicowski *Department of Plant Pathology, Entomology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0949-2617
Melissa Bredow *Department of Plant Pathology, Entomology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5564-9646
Alice Satiko UtiyamaBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation - National Soybean Research Center (Embrapa Soja), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Francismar Corrêa Marcelino-GuimarãesBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation - National Soybean Research Center (Embrapa Soja), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-7249
Steven A WhithamDepartment of Plant Pathology, Entomology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3542-3188
Iowa State University · USBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorIowa State University Plant Sciences InstituteMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 440782/2022-8National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project 4308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean rust (SBR), caused by the obligate biotrophic fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi, is a devastating foliar disease threatening soybean production. To date, no commercial cultivars conferring durable resistance to SBR are available. The development of long-lasting SBR resistance has been hindered by the lack of understanding of this complex pathosystem, encompassing challenges posed by intricate genetic structures in both the host and pathogen, leading to a gap in the knowledge of gene-for-gene interactions between soybean and P. pachyrhizi. In this review, we focus on recent advancements and emerging technologies that can be used to improve our understanding of the P. pachyrhizi-soybean molecular interactions. We further explore approaches used to combat SBR, including conventional breeding, transgenic approaches and RNA interference, and how advances in our understanding of plant immune networks, the availability of new molecular tools, and the recent sequencing of the P. pachyrhizi genome could be used to aid in the development of better genetic resistance against SBR. Lastly, we discuss the research gaps of this pathosystem and how new technologies can be used to shed light on these questions and to develop durable next-generation SBR-resistant soybean plants.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaPhakopsora pachyrhiziGlycine maxPlant BreedingPlant Diseasesdisease resistanceeffectorsgenome sequencingresistance gene engineeringR genesSoybean rust

Identifiers

PMID37883664
PMCPMC10826999
OpenAlexW4387964881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.