Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37883581›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Merging short and stranded long reads improves transcript assembly.

Amoldeep S Kainth, Gabriela A Haddad, Johnathon M Hall, Alexander J Ruthenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome sequence assembly and annotation ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amoldeep S KainthDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8116-7747
Gabriela A HaddadCommittee on Genetics, Genomics and Systems Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Johnathon M HallDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7469-412X
Alexander J RuthenburgDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND REGULATIONT32GM007197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROTHMAN-DENES, LUCIA B. B · 1985 to 2020
$17.0M
Genetic Mechanisms and Evolution-RenewalT32GM139782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Francesca Luca, John Novembre · 2021 to 2026
$5.1M
Gene Regulatory Non-Coding RNAs in the Human HeartR01HL148719 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MOSKOWITZ, IVAN PAUL, RUTHENBURG, ALEXANDER JACKSON · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
Defining the mechanisms of epigenetic information flowR35GM145373 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Alexander Jackson Ruthenburg · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148719NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145373NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007197NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-read RNA sequencing has arisen as a counterpart to short-read sequencing, with the potential to capture full-length isoforms, albeit at the cost of lower depth. Yet this potential is not fully realized due to inherent limitations of current long-read assembly methods and underdeveloped approaches to integrate short-read data. Here, we critically compare the existing methods and develop a new integrative approach to characterize a particularly challenging pool of low-abundance long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) transcripts from short- and long-read sequencing in two distinct cell lines. Our analysis reveals severe limitations in each of the sequencing platforms. For short-read assemblies, coverage declines at transcript termini resulting in ambiguous ends, and uneven low coverage results in segmentation of a single transcript into multiple transcripts. Conversely, long-read sequencing libraries lack depth and strand-of-origin information in cDNA-based methods, culminating in erroneous assembly and quantitation of transcripts. We also discover a cDNA synthesis artifact in long-read datasets that markedly impacts the identity and quantitation of assembled transcripts. Towards remediating these problems, we develop a computational pipeline to "strand" long-read cDNA libraries that rectifies inaccurate mapping and assembly of long-read transcripts. Leveraging the strengths of each platform and our computational stranding, we also present and benchmark a hybrid assembly approach that drastically increases the sensitivity and accuracy of full-length transcript assembly on the correct strand and improves detection of biological features of the transcriptome. When applied to a challenging set of under-annotated and cell-type variable lncRNA, our method resolves the segmentation problem of short-read sequencing and the depth problem of long-read sequencing, resulting in the assembly of coherent transcripts with precise 5' and 3' ends. Our workflow can be applied to existing datasets for superior demarcation of transcript ends and refined isoform structure, which can enable better differential gene expression analyses and molecular manipulations of transcripts.

Indexed as

RNA, Long NoncodingDNA, ComplementaryGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingProtein IsoformsSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeDNA, ComplementaryProtein IsoformsRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID37883581
PMCPMC10629667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.