Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37883523›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2024

The elicitor VP2 from Verticillium dahliae triggers defence response in cotton.

Ping Qiu, Baoxin Zheng, Hang Yuan, Zhaoguang Yang, Keith Lindsey, Yan Wang, Yuqing Ming, Lin Zhang, Qin Hu, Muhammad Shaban and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deleting an xylosidase-encoding geneFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ping QiuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Baoxin ZhengNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Hang YuanNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Zhaoguang YangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Keith LindseyDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Yan WangCollege of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7465-5518
Yuqing MingNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Lin ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Qin HuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Muhammad ShabanNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Jie KongInstitute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, People's Republic of China.
Xianlong ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-524X
Longfu ZhuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-8609
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNDurham University · GBNanjing Agricultural University · CNXinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

Hubei Hongshan Laboratory 2022hszd004The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China 2022YFD1200303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Verticillium dahliae is a widespread and destructive soilborne vascular pathogenic fungus that causes serious diseases in dicot plants. Here, comparative transcriptome analysis showed that the number of genes upregulated in defoliating pathotype V991 was significantly higher than in the non-defoliating pathotype 1cd3-2 during the early response of cotton. Combined with analysis of the secretome during the V991-cotton interaction, an elicitor VP2 was identified, which was highly upregulated at the early stage of V991 invasion, but was barely expressed during the 1cd3-2-cotton interaction. Full-length VP2 could induce cell death in several plant species, and which was dependent on NbBAK1 but not on NbSOBIR1 in N. benthamiana. Knock-out of VP2 attenuated the pathogenicity of V991. Furthermore, overexpression of VP2 in cotton enhanced resistance to V. dahliae without causing abnormal plant growth and development. Several genes involved in JA, SA and lignin synthesis were significantly upregulated in VP2-overexpressing cotton. The contents of JA, SA, and lignin were also significantly higher than in the wild-type control. In summary, the identified elicitor VP2, recognized by the receptor in the plant membrane, triggers the cotton immune response and enhances disease resistance.

Indexed as

AscomycotaVerticilliumDisease ResistanceGene Expression Regulation, PlantGossypiumLigninPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsLigninPlant Proteinscomparative transcriptome analysiscottonelicitorgermplasm innovationinduced resistanceVerticillium dahliae

Identifiers

PMID37883523
PMCPMC10826990
OpenAlexW4387965922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.