Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37883295›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Individual-based landscape genomics for conservation: An analysis pipeline.

E Anne Chambers, Anusha P Bishop, Ian J Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distinguishing species boundaries from geographic variation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E Anne ChambersDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7369-0108
Anusha P BishopDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1731-8683
Ian J WangDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-9414

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-1845682State of California RSI-19-690224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landscape genomics can harness environmental and genetic data to inform conservation decisions by providing essential insights into how landscapes shape biodiversity. The massive increase in genetic data afforded by the genomic era provides exceptional resolution for answering critical conservation genetics questions. The accessibility of genomic data for non-model systems has also enabled a shift away from population-based sampling to individual-based sampling, which now provides accurate and robust estimates of genetic variation that can be used to examine the spatial structure of genomic diversity, population connectivity and the nature of environmental adaptation. Nevertheless, the adoption of individual-based sampling in conservation genetics has been slowed due, in large part, to concerns over how to apply methods developed for population-based sampling to individual-based sampling schemes. Here, we discuss the benefits of individual-based sampling for conservation and describe how landscape genomic methods, paired with individual-based sampling, can answer fundamental conservation questions. We have curated key landscape genomic methods into a user-friendly, open-source workflow, which we provide as a new R package, A Landscape Genomics Analysis Toolkit in R (algatr). The algatr package includes novel added functionality for all of the included methods and extensive vignettes designed with the primary goal of making landscape genomic approaches more accessible and explicitly applicable to conservation biology.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetics, PopulationGenomicsBiodiversityGenetic Variationconservation biologyconservation geneticsgenetic diversitylandscape genomicspopulation structurespatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID37883295
PMCPMC12142729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.